Author: J. Mark Welch

A key factor in the development of a new crop price forecast is how many acres farmers plant of each crop.  USDA surveys farmers each year and reports early season acreage intentions in the Prospective Plantings report, released at the end of March. Then at the end of June, the Acreage report from USDA details the area of each major crop planted.  Since 2006, U.S. farmers have planted about 244 million acres to corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, sorghum, and rice.  Corn and soybeans account for the largest crop areas planted, reaching 181 million acres combined in 2021 (Figure 1).   

Figure 1. U.S. Planted Acres

From an economic standpoint, relative crop profitability is an important driver of planting decisions. One indicator of that profitability is the relative price of one 3.11commodity to another.^[1] Given the large area impacted and the typical rotation between these two crops, the soybean-to-corn price ratio is widely watched as providing insight into what farmers ultimately plant each spring. 

An aspect of how the price relationship between soybeans and corn impacts planting decisions can be seen in the relationship of the soybean-to-corn price ratio and the number of corn acres planted in excess of soybeans each year.  In general, when the price ratio of Risk Management Agency (RMA) soybean-to-corn projected prices, calculated each February^[2] is relatively low, corn acres increase at the expense of soybeans. At high ratios, soybean acres increase relative to corn (Figure 2).    

Figure 2. Corn Acres Minus Soybean Acres and RMA’s Soybean-to-Corn Projected Price Ratio

The average price ratio from 2006 to 2022 is 2.36 and the average number of corn acres over soybean acres is 10 million.  At the extreme, in 2007 the soybean-to-corn projected price ratio was 1.99 and farmers planted 93.5 million acres of corn and 64.7 million acres of soybeans, a difference of 28.8 million acres (Figure 2). When the price ratio has been at its highest, 2.57 to 2.59, we have seen plantings of corn and soybeans about equal (2017 and 2018). But the price ratio at this level is also associated with 6 million more acres of corn than soybeans in 2021.  Corn acres relative to soybean acres were much smaller than expected in 2022, a difference of only 1.1 million acres despite a price ratio of 2.43.  It is likely that risks associated with high fertilizer prices and product availability had an impact on farmers’ planting decisions last year given higher fertilizer requirements for corn compared to soybeans. 

The RMA soybean to corn base price ratio for 2023 is 2.33 ($13.76 soybeans, $5.91 corn). If the total planted area remains constant, that suggests an increase in corn acres and a decrease in soybean acres in 2023 compared to 2022.  In other years when the price ratio rounded to 2.3 (2010, 2013, 2015, and 2016), the range of corn acres over soybeans were 5.3 million to 15.6 million.  If corn and soybean acres again total about 180 million, the low estimate of corn acres for 2023 would be 92.7 million acres and the high estimate of soybean acres 87.4 million acres.  

Of course, other factors besides relative prices matter when farmers make their planting decisions. Among these are crop rotations that boost productivity and input efficiency, input costs, and of course, weather. And in the South, cotton is a major non-grain competing crop enterprise whose price and profitability are not part of this analysis.   But, the price ratio between major crops may provide a key piece of information in forming expectations of what upcoming acreage reports may reveal. 

---

^[1] For more on relative price relationships between commodities, see Rabinowitz, Adam. “The Peanut-Cotton Price Relationship.” Southern Ag Today 3(2.1). January 9, 2023.

^[2] RMA Price Discovery, base prices for 2023, conventional practices with a March 15 sales closing date, RMA Price Discovery – Home (usda.gov).

---

Welch, Mark. “The Soybean to Corn Price Ratio as a Guide to Farmers’ Planting Decisions.” Southern Ag Today 3(11.1). March 13, 2023. Permalink

Since the fall of 2020, grain prices have risen significantly (Figure 1). Production shortfalls in the U.S. (derecho windstorm in August 2020 and drought in 2022), drought in South America, increasing feed demand in China, followed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, pushed cash grain prices, in many cases, to near record highs. Late in 2022, cash prices were back down to pre-Russian invasion levels, but still historically high. 

Price forecasts for the 2023 crops will rightly focus much attention on planting intentions and yield prospects. High prices in the U.S. and globally provide market incentives for farmers to increase production.

But the other side of the supply and demand balance sheet deserves attention as well. Looking at the 2022/23 marketing year corn market in the U.S., feed and residual use and fuel use are the two largest use categories, 5.3 billion and 5.275 billion bushels, respectively. Next are exports at 2.075 billion bushels (Figure 2). Market conditions point to increased production in 2023, but what about use?

For the feed use category, data from USDA shows a decline in Grain Consuming Animal Units (poultry, pork, and cattle) over the last several years (USDA, ERS 2022). Gasoline demand, the foundation of ethanol use, is dampened by newer vehicles that use fuel more efficiently, or, in a growing segment of the automobile industry, do not use any gasoline at all (EIA, 2022). Export demand is impacted by the availability of exportable grain supplies from other major production areas, the value of the dollar, and global economic growth prospects. Grain use can go down when incomes and GDP slow down or decline. Global economic growth prospects will be slowed by the continued turmoil of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, broad inflation pressures, and lingering COVID pandemic effects (IMF, 2022). 

Early season grain budgets for 2023 show high prices and high input costs resulting in tight margins for farmers in many production areas. An increase in grain supplies in 2023 relative to use could result in lower prices that squeeze these margins even more as we head into summer and fall.   

Figure 1. Texas Cash Corn, Cash Sorghum, and Cash Wheat, Weekly, July 2020 to December 2022

Figure 2. U.S. Corn Use, 2005/06-2022/23

References

Energy Information Administration. “This Week in Petroleum”, available online at https://www.eia.gov/.

International Monetary Fund. “World Economic Outlook Report October 2022”, available online at https://www.imf.org/en/Home.

USDA, ERS. “Feed Grains Database”, available online at https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/feed-grains-database/.  

Author: Mark Welch

Professor and Extension Economist Grain Markets and Marketing, Risk Management, Production Economics

---

Welch, Mark. “The Demand Side of the Supply and Demand Balance Sheet.” Southern Ag Today 3(3.1). January 16, 2023. Permalink

The Southern region of the United States is more associated with cotton production than wheat. Yet, from 2005 to 2022, a time of high grain prices associated with increased production of biofuels, wheat planted acres in the South, on average, have exceeded that of cotton (Figure 1).  Wheat acres and production in the region are dominated by Oklahoma and Texas (Figure 2); Texas also leads cotton planted acres, by far, followed by Georgia (Figure 3). In 2022, the South will account for about 20 percent of total U.S. wheat production (USDA, NASS, Crop Production, August 2022). 

The year with the most wheat acres in the South in this ‘biofuel era’ is 2013 at 17.3 million. That year saw the highest plantings in seven of the fourteen states in the region for this period of time: Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. Oklahoma and Texas are not on this list. Acreage increases across multiple states can add up to make a significant difference in total wheat area in the region.  

Wheat is a crop with relatively high yield potential across the South. This becomes especially important when drought impacts major producing states.  With drought lowering harvested acres and yields, Oklahoma and Texas are projected to produce about 109 million bushels of wheat in 2022 from 4 million harvested acres and 9.8 million acres planted (Figure 4).  The states of Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, Maryland, and Virginia combined to plant about 2 million acres of wheat for 2022 and will match the production total in Oklahoma and Texas. Kentucky’s production alone is 90 percent of that of Texas.  

Years with high wheat acres in the South tend to be associated with years of relatively low cotton acres (Figure 5).  Crop acres are positively correlated with the price received in the previous season (Figures 6 and 7). Wheat acres are negatively correlated to higher cotton prices (Figure 8).  Additionally, wheat acres tend to go up following years of high abandonment of cotton in Texas and Oklahoma (abandonment rates in other Southeastern states are minimal) (Figure 9).  In 2022, Texas and Oklahoma farmers planted 8.6 million acres of cotton, only to harvest 2.8 million (a harvested-to-planted percentage of 33 percent). 

Looking ahead to 2023, what are wheat acreage prospects in the South given:

• record high wheat prices^[*]
• record high cotton prices^*, and
• high cotton abandonment in Texas and Oklahoma? 

A regression model composed of these independent variables and recent trends in wheat planted acres shows that wheat planted area:

• is trending lower,
• goes up when the price of wheat the previous year goes up,
• goes down when the price of cotton the previous year goes up,
• goes up when percent of cotton harvested in Texas and Oklahoma the previous year goes down.   

Based on these variables, the model estimate of wheat acres in the South for 2023 is 14.4 million, up from 12.7 million acres planted in 2022 (Figure 10). Many factors will shape farmers’ planting decisions in 2023, among them persistently high input costs, lingering drought, returns from other crops such as corn and soybeans, and price prospects given global economic and geopolitical turmoil and uncertainty. This model suggests that significant factors are in place for an increase in wheat acres in 2023, maintaining wheat as an important crop enterprise in the South. 

Figure 1. Southern region planted wheat and cotton acres, 2005-2022

Figure 2. High, low, and average winter wheat acres in the South, 2005-2022

Figure 3. High low, and average cotton acres in the South, 2005-2022

Figure 4. Southern region wheat production 2022, million bushels

Figure 5. Wheat acres and cotton acres in the South, 2005-2022

Figure 6. Wheat acres in the South and the previous year’s wheat price, 2006-2022

Figure 7. Cotton acres in the South and the previous year’s cotton price, 2006-2022

Figure 8. Wheat acres in the South and the previous year’s cotton price, 2006-2022

Figure 9. Wheat acres in the South and percent cotton acres harvested the previous year in Texas and Oklahoma, 2006-2022

Figure 10. Southern region wheat acreage model

---

^[*] U.S. Season Average Farm Price, World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates, September 2022

Welch, J. Mark. “Wheat Acres in the South“. Southern Ag Today 2(43.1). October 17, 2022. Permalink

Feed and residual use has long been the largest consumption category in the USDA supply and demand tables for U.S. corn (Figure 1)^[1]. That began to change with the passage of the Renewable Fuel Standard Program in 2005^[2]. Corn for fuel increased over the next several years, from under two billion bushels in the 2005/2006 marketing year to over five billion bushels in 2011/2012 when it overtook corn for feed as the number one use category.  Since then, fuel and feed have competed for the top spot for corn consumption.   

Additionally, the price of corn has been increasing in the biofuel era. From the increased planting flexibility in the Freedom to Farm Act in 1996 to the passage of the Renewable Fuel Standard in 2005, prices averaged $2.15 per bushel with a low of $1.82 in 1999 and a high of $2.71 in 1996. From 2006 to 2021, the average price more than doubled to $4.33 per bushel with a low of $3.04 in 2006 and high of $6.89 in 2012. Currently, the price estimate for the 2022 corn crop is $6.65, reflective of a 54% increase in one year alone.

The peak in corn for feed consumption came in the 2004/2005 marketing year at just over six billion bushels. After the passage of the Renewable Fuel Standard in 2005, feed use began to fall, and the price of corn began to increase (Figure 2). From 2013 to 2019, the price of corn appears to be associated with an increase in feed use. Since 2020, feed use has fallen with increases in corn price.

There is more to the corn story than the inverse relationship between feed input demand and prices, and the implications of relatively higher corn prices are always looming. In spite of the fall in corn for feed use in 2006 associated with the RFS, an ethanol fuel co-product became available known as distiller’s dried grains with solubles (DDGS).  Each bushel of corn (56 pounds) used for fuel produces about 16 pounds of DDGS which adds to feed grain production, providing some price relief to cattle, pork, and poultry producers.  In addition, the size of the livestock and poultry industries, measured by grain consuming animal units (GCAUs), has grown from about 75 million in the 1980s to 101.7 million GCAUs in 2019 (Figure 3). Another trend in the feed use category we can draw from GCAUs is the inverse relationship between corn prices and feed use. There was a rebound in use as prices fell from their record highs in 2012 with a peak in 2014. Even with relatively low and stable prices, energy feed plus DDGS per GCAU has been on a downward trend. That points to an increasingly efficient meat sector producing more pounds of protein on fewer pounds of feed.  

What does this mean for corn prices moving forward? From the demand side of the balance sheet, the feed use category near term looks to be limited by lower overall GCAUs and declining feed use per GCAU. As livestock and poultry numbers increase and as grain prices go down, we may not return to previous levels of use. Improved feeding efficiencies may dampen the feed use response in future supply and demand balance sheets.   

Figure 1. U.S. Corn Use

Figure 2. U.S. Corn Feed and Residual Use and Season Average Farm Price

Figure 3. Grain Consuming Animal Units (GCAU) and Energy Feed per GCAU

---

^[1] For an explanation of the feed and residual use category used by USDA in their supply and demand tables, see “Implications of an Early Corn Crop Harvest for Feed and Residual Use Estimates”, FDS-12f-01, Economic Research Service/USDA July 2012.

^[2] Details of the Renewable Fuel Standard Program authorized under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and expanded under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 can be found at https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program.

The 2023 winter wheat crop will soon be going in the ground.  As planning and preparations are under way, producers continue to struggle with the challenges of high input costs, volatile commodity markets, weather extremes (drought in the west, flooding in the east), and global geopolitical instability. 

As many input costs are being locked in, an important question is where do output prices go from here? A key tenet of economic theory provides insight into that question. In 1890, Lord Alfred Marshall told us where prices are going in the long run: prices will go to the cost of production (Marshall, 1890).  In a free market economy, a price above the cost of production will provide incentives for an increase in supply or entice other entrants into the market. Prices below the cost of production will cause supply to decrease or participants to exit the marketplace.  

Successful and sustainable financial performance in an economy where prices move to the cost of production implies two key components of management strategy that revolve around production and price:

1. Be the low cost/high quality producer. Input use efficiency is critical to achieve the lowest possible breakeven cost. Tools to achieve this goal include the use of crop rotations, hybrid and variety selection, conservation tillage, soil, and plant testing, and precision application of inputs.
2. Lock in profitable prices.  Tools of financial management include budgets and breakeven analyses, cash flow projections, crop insurance, marketing plans, and price safety net provisions. 

Does this management approach work?  Evidence of the impact of these management strategies can be found by looking at the financial performance of the top 20 percent of corn producers over the last several years.  This information can be found in the FINBIN database (FINBIN, 2022). This database summarizes actual farm data from thousands of agricultural producers.  

Sorting key production and price characteristics by financial performance shows that, compared to the overall average, the top 20 percent of corn growers in 2021 had higher yields, received higher prices, and had lower costs (Figure 1).  Looking back over the last several years, this group, the top 20 percent, outperformed the average every year in every category with one lone exception. In 2018, the average of all corn producers received a one percent higher price (Figure 2).  

As a farm management philosophy, consider the adoption of what Danny Klinefelter, retired professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Texas A&M University and founder of The Executive Program for Agricultural Producers (TEPAP), calls the ‘5% rule’ (Janzen, 2018).  In the upcoming crop year, where can I lower my costs by five percent? How can I increase my yields by five percent? How can I increase my average price received by five percent? Making relatively small changes in critically important areas over time can have a dramatic impact on financial performance.    

Figure 1. 2021 Corn on Cash Rent Summary Report

Figure 2. Corn on Cash Rent Summary Report Comparisons, High 20% to Overall Average, 2018-202

References

FINBIN. Center for Farm Financial Management, University of Minnesota. Accessed August 1, 2022 and available at https://finbin.umn.edu/. 

Janzen, Joseph. “The “5% rule of farm management shows how all the pieces matter”, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Montana State University, Business and Finance posts, January 16, 2018.  Accessed August 2, 2022 and available at https://ageconmt.com/. 

Marshall, Alfred. Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan, 1890.  

Welch, J. Mark. “Key Farm Management Considerations in Turbulent Times: The 5% Rule“. Southern Ag Today 2(34.1). August 15, 2022. Permalink