Author: Max Runge

  • Contract Grazing: A Flexible Option for Row Crop Producers

    Contract Grazing: A Flexible Option for Row Crop Producers

    Row crop producers across the country are feeling the financial squeeze. High input costs and low commodity prices are tightening profit margins, and the outlook for 2026 offers little relief. With limited optimism for lower costs or stronger commodity prices, many row crop farmers are exploring new income streams to keep their operations profitable. One option gaining traction is contract grazing—custom growing cattle for someone else.

    This arrangement allows farmers with available land and suitable forage to generate income without the expense of owning cattle. It’s a practical way to put available acreage to work, diversify income, and reduce risk in uncertain times.

    Evaluating Resources

    Before entering a contract grazing arrangement, it’s essential to evaluate your available resources. Key considerations include:

    • Fencing – Assess the condition of existing fences, estimate the cost of repairs or new construction.
    • Cattle-handling facilities – Adequate corrals, chutes, and working areas are necessary for safe and efficient receiving and shipping of cattle on your property.
    • Feed and water systems – Ensure water quality and quantity meet livestock needs throughout the grazing season.
    • Accessibility – Many stocker operations move truckload lots of cattle (typically 50,000 pounds), so all-weather access roads are important.

    This list isn’t exhaustive but highlights key infrastructure requirements that can determine the feasibility of a grazing enterprise.

    Integrating Grazing with Crop Land

    For row crop producers, contract grazing can complement existing cropping systems rather than replace them. Fields used for row crops can often support grazing through cover crops, winter annual forages, or dedicated hay and grazing acres. Common options include small grains such as wheat, oats, or rye, as well as annual forages like ryegrass or haygrazer. These forages can fit naturally between summer cash crops, making use of otherwise idle land during the off-season.

    Integrating livestock grazing into crop rotations offers several potential benefits, including improved soil health, enhanced nutrient cycling, and reduced weed and residue management costs. Grazing cover crops can also help capture and recycle nutrients while adding an additional income stream through a grazing contract.

    However, shifting to a mixed crop-livestock system requires careful planning. Farmers must consider planting and termination dates, soil compaction risks, and the potential impact on subsequent crops. When managed properly, the combination of row crops and grazing livestock can strengthen overall system resilience and profitability.

    Experience and Cattle Management

    Experience with cattle is another critical factor. Owners are unlikely to place animals with someone lacking livestock management experience. It’s essential to understand the type of cattle involved (e.g., stockers, heifers, cows, or cow-calf pairs) and how to manage each group effectively.

    The source and history of the cattle also matter. Animals from multiple origins may pose higher management challenges or disease risks, requiring more experience and attention to detail. If contract grazing becomes a long-term enterprise, building trust and credibility within the local cattle community is vital for success.

    Forage, Feed, and Water Management

    Grazing is typically the most cost-effective feeding strategy, but weather and seasonal changes can reduce forage availability. Successful contract growers plan ahead by maintaining supplemental feed supplies or developing alternative forage options.

    Water management is equally important. Cattle spend more time grazing near water, so the placement of water sources directly influences pasture use. Strategically positioned water sources encourage more uniform grazing, support pasture health, and improve overall livestock performance.

    Well-maintained infrastructure—including fences, water systems, and forage stands—not only keeps cattle secure but also enhances the efficiency and profitability of the operation.

    The Importance of a Written Contract

    A clear, written contract protects both the grower and the cattle owner, helping to ensure that expectations are understood from the start. Key elements to include are:

    1. Parties involved – Names and contact details of both the grower and owner.
    2. Property description – Location, acreage, and pasture details.
    3. Contract duration – Start and end dates, or total grazing period.
    4. Animal details – Type, number, and starting weights of cattle.
    5. Responsibilities – Who provides veterinary care, feed, insurance, and transportation.
    6. Death losses – Agreement on how death losses are handled.
    7. Payment terms – Fee structure and schedule (daily rate, per-pound-of-gain, or revenue share).
    8. Termination clause – Conditions under which the agreement can end.

    Determining Payment and Cost Responsibilities

    Payment structures vary depending on the type of cattle and management objectives. A daily rate is often used for breeding stock, while per-pound-of-gain agreements fit well for stocker cattle. Some operations also use a revenue-sharing model, dividing sale proceeds at the end of the grazing period.

    Before agreeing on rates, both parties should have a clear understanding of their financial boundaries. Growers must calculate total costs—which include feed, labor, maintenance, and management—then add a fair return on investment. Cattle owners should estimate the expected value of gain to determine what they can afford to pay.

    In addition to the key elements above, details are critical. Contracts should clearly define:

    • Feed responsibilities – Who provides supplemental feed during droughts or shortages.
    • Stocking rates – Number or weight of cattle per acre, with flexibility for weather-related events.
    • Shared costs – How expenses like mineral supplements, fly control, and veterinary treatments will be handled.

    A Flexible Tool for Changing Times

    Contract grazing won’t solve every financial challenge, but it can be a smart, flexible strategy for producers looking to adapt. It spreads production risk, reduces capital requirements, and makes productive use of existing land and infrastructure.

    In today’s uncertain agricultural economy, creativity and collaboration matter more than ever. For some operations, contract grazing may provide the bridge between tight margins and long-term financial resilience.


    Adapted from “Contract Growing Cattle Considerations,” University of Tennessee Extension Publication W1337. Available at https://utbeef.tennessee.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/127/2025/10/W1337.pdf.


    Runge, Max. “Contract Grazing: A Flexible Option for Row Crop Producers.Southern Ag Today 5(45.1). November 3, 2025. Permalink

  • Variety Selection Resources

    Variety Selection Resources

    Choosing the best variety of seed has always been important for producers, but in 2025 this decision will likely carry more weight. With the squeeze of lower commodity prices and higher input prices, variety selection that is best suited for each producer’s growing conditions is a factor that affects the bottom line. Time spent evaluating the numerous varietal choices this time of year will be worth the time and effort.

    There are numerous sources to gather information about the varieties for an individual grower’s situation. It’s worth pointing out that there isn’t a “one size fits all” strategy to select the best variety. Utilizing more than one source is recommended but be cautious not to seek too many sources as this may add to the confusion.  Here are some resources that can be utilized in making a varietal selection.

    The variety selection process should start and end with your knowledge and experience with your fields and growing conditions.  Good records help to provide valuable information and fill in some details that may be forgotten over the growing season. It’s important to try to match varieties to your fields. For example, low lying fields may have more fertile soil but could have wet areas, and fields on hillsides may not have the yield potential of other fields.

    Other sources of information for variety selection are neighbors that have similar growing conditions, seed company representatives, and farm supply stores. Keep in mind that some of these resources may focus heavily on the products they represent or profit from and, therefore, could be biased in their recommendations. Developing productive relationships with all of these individuals can lead to better and more confident variety decisions.

    The most important source of information is from the variety testing programs at land grant university systems. Most land grant university research and extension programs have variety testing trials that provide unbiased results. These variety tests are usually in strategic locations across the state to provide growing conditions that are similar to growers in the area. While not all growing conditions can be represented in official trials, they could provide valuable information. Check with your state’s land grant research/extension programs to find out about variety trial information in your area.

    There are two kinds of trials that universities may be involved with, as seen in Figure 1 Variety Tests. 

    Figure 1. Variety Tests*Official Variety Trial (OVT) Small PlotsOn-Farm
    Conducted by:OVT ProgramExtension 
    LocatedResearch StationsGrower Fields and Research Stations
    Plot SizeSmallLarge
    # of Varieties More (up to 50+)Fewer (less than 15)
    TypesReleased & Experimental Mostly Released
    ReplicationAlwaysNot always
    Statistical Analysis AlwaysNot always
    EquipmentResearch Commercial 

    There are advantages and disadvantages to both the Official Variety Trial (OVT) Small Plots and On-Farm trials. The replication and statistical analysis, along with more experimental varieties, are advantages of the OVT Small Plots. The On-Farm plots are larger and managed on a scale closer to commercial production practices.  It’s also important to consider multiple years of results and not base the decision on one year’s performance. Also, look at as many details of the trial as possible. What were the fertility levels of the plot, and how much fertilizer was applied? What other pesticides were used and at what rate? What were the growing conditions? Were the climatic conditions stressful, if so, how did that affect yields?

    In summary, variety selection is crucial as we are looking at an economically challenging growing season in 2025. Match the varieties to your growing conditions as best as possible. Time and effort spent now in selecting varieties for your farm is one of the best investments that a producer can make. 

    Resources: 

    *Figure 1. Adopted from OVT Small Plots vs On-Farm FAQ https://aaes.auburn.edu/variety-tests/ovt-frequently-asked-questions/

    Auburn University Official Variety Testing – https://aaes.auburn.edu/variety-tests/


    Runge, Max. “Variety Selection Resources. Southern Ag Today 5(4.1). January 20, 2025. Permalink

  • Almost Time to Think Turkey

    Almost Time to Think Turkey

    We are six weeks away from 2024 Thanksgiving but it’s not too early to think about the meals that may include turkey. Here is some pertinent turkey information as we are preparing for the end of the year celebrations. One of the first considerations is production, a key part of turkey supplies. The 2024 federally inspected turkey production (weekly), is shown in Figure 1. Year to date, turkey production is running 3.29% below 2023 levels and 6.44% less than the five-year average (2018 – 2022). While lower production is usually a cause for price concerns, that is not likely to be the case this year as turkey prices have remained lower than 2023 throughout 2024.

    Turkey in storage is another important consideration in turkey supplies for Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. As seen in the in Figure 1, turkey processing occurs throughout the year with an increase in late October and early November. Cold storage is important in managing the supply of turkeys and to ensure that adequate supplies are available for the end of the year demand. Figure 2 indicates that all turkey in cold storage for 2024 is 2.1 percent higher than in 2023, but 8.9 percent less than the 2018 -2022 average. Digging a little deeper in the cold storage data indicates that while there are 1.1 percent fewer tom turkeys, whole hens in cold storage are up 4.4 percent.  

    With 2024 turkey production running only slightly lower than last year’s production and quantities of frozen turkey in cold storage above 2023 levels, what will that mean for turkey prices in 2024?  The 2024 fourth quarter wholesale price projection for an 8 – 16 pound frozen turkey hen is forecast to be $0.95 cents per pound, wholesale. This is 5.75 % less than 2023 prices ($1.01) and 47% less than fourth quarter prices ($1.78 ) in 2022. Like usual, there will be plenty of turkeys for Thanksgiving dinner.  But, you might look for deals and specials and shop early to make sure you get just the right bird for your holiday table. In conclusion, it’s looks to be a good year to enjoy turkeys for the holidays.  

  • Are the Pre-Season Polls (Crop Production Reports) Accurate?

    Are the Pre-Season Polls (Crop Production Reports) Accurate?

    USDA NASS has released the equivalent of college football’s pre-season poll, which is the August Crop Production report (released August 12). The Crop Production report provides an estimate of acreage, area harvested, yields, and production for the major row crops in the U.S.  Additional crop production reports (polls) will be released in September, October, and November. The Annual Crop Production report (final poll) will be released in January.

    For the states represented in the Southern Ag Today area, estimates for cotton yields garner a lot of attention.  How accurate are these August estimates to actual yields? Table 1 shows the actual five-year average (2019 – 2023) annual cotton yield compared to the five-year average of the August yield projection. 

    Table 1.  Annual Cotton yield vs. August estimates yields (5-year averages)

    There is a range in the percent difference in the actual yields versus the August estimates. The actual five-year average ranges from 17.43 percent below the five-year estimated August yield (Florida) to just over 8 percent higher than the August estimate (Tennessee).

    Like pre-season polls, the estimated yields can vary from the actual annual yield for numerous reasons.  Wind and excess rain from tropical weather events cause the largest decline in yields from the August estimate to the actual yields. While we won’t know for several months what our actual yields are (or our favorite team’s record), the pre-season projections provide some insight.

    Reference: USDA NASS Crop Production

    https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/tm70mv177/4b29cz98b/9593wm26b/crop0824.pdf


    Runge, Max. “Are the Pre-Season Polls (Crop Production Reports) Accurate?Southern Ag Today 4(35.3). August 28, 2024. Permalink

  • Milk Cows in the Southeast 

    Milk Cows in the Southeast 

    Included in the biannual Cattle report is the number of milk cows that have calved in the U.S. and by most individual states. The number milk cows that have calved are holding steady at the national level but individual states in the Southeast show variations in inventory (Table 1). Florida is the only state that shows an increase in milk cows that have calved, while Arkansas, Louisiana, and South Carolina had double digit percentage losses. The thirteen Southeastern states account for 11.33 percent of the milk cows that have calved in the U.S. Texas has the largest number of milk cows in the Southeast and has the fourth highest milk cow inventory in the U.S.

    Table 1. 2023 2024Percent of
    (1,000 head)(1,000 head)previous year
    Texas65063598
    Florida9298107
    Georgia929199
    Virginia676699
    Kentucky454396
    North Carolina393897
    Oklahoma393897
    Tennessee262596
    South Carolina9889
    Louisiana8788
    Mississippi66100
    Arkansas4375
    Alabama22100
    U.S. 9,397.509,356.80100
    Source: https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/h702q636h

    In addition to inventories, milk production per cow is a crucial factor for the dairy industry. Using the 2023 annual production estimates from USDA Quick Stats database, Texas is the only Southeastern state that has a per cow milk production average that is higher than the U. S. average of 24,117 pounds of milk per head, as seen in table 2.

    Table 2.
    Annual Milk Production
    Pounds/Head
    TEXAS25,802
    NORTH CAROLINA23,526
    GEORGIA22,275
    VIRGINIA20,882
    KENTUCKY20,333
    FLORIDA20,313
    TENNESSEE18,680
    SOUTH CAROLINA18,500
    OKLAHOMA17,692
    ALABAMA14,000
    LOUISIANA12,625
    MISSISSIPPI12,333
    ARKANSAS11,000
    U.S. Average24,117
    Source:  https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/

    Milk production in the U.S. is increasing over the long term but, it’s coming from regions other than the Southeast. For more than a year, dairy producers have suffered from disastrously low milk prices and low returns.  The result of low milk prices has been declining dairy cow numbers, milk production per cow falling below year before levels, and reduced total milk production in some months reversing the long term trend of increasing milk production.  


    Runge, Max . “Milk Cows in the Southeast.” Southern Ag Today 4(17.2). April 23, 2024. Permalink