Author: Max Runge

  • 2024 Prospective Plantings for Southern Ag Today States

    2024 Prospective Plantings for Southern Ag Today States

    The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) released its annual Prospective Plantings report on March 28, 2024.  This report typically isn’t as exciting as college basketball’s March Madness, but the Prospective Plantings report does supply estimates of acreage that affects the agricultural markets and provides the basis for numerous discussions for the upcoming growing season. 

    What does the 2024 Prospective Plantings report show for the Southern Ag Today States? The following tables show the prospective planting acreage for the Southeastern states, with the 2023 planted acres and the predicted 2024 acres (and 2024 acres as a percentage of the 2023 acres). The states are listed in rank from most to least 2024 acres.

    Table 1 indicates the corn acres that are projected for the Southeastern states. Oklahoma is the only southern state that shows an increase in 2024 corn acres while Arkansas and Mississippi are predicted to plant about 25% fewer acres. While the Southeastern states are expected to plant about 10% of the U.S. corn acres, this is 27.67% of the reduction in U.S.2024 corn acres. While some of the lost corn acres in the Southeast are shifted to soybean and cotton, there are some acres that are not reflected in the 2024 major crop plantings.

    Overall, the U.S. is predicted to plant 90 million acres in 2024. This is five percent lower than 2023 acres and slightly lower than industry expectations, resulting in a sixteen-cent rally for December 2024 corn futures prices.

    Table 1.  2023 Acres and Prospective Plantings for 2024, Corn (1,000 acres) 
     
    2023
    2024 Prospective
    Acres% of 2023
    Texas2,5002,10084
    Kentucky1,6001,55097
    Tennessee94093099
    N. Carolina95089094
    Arkansas85062073
    Mississippi79059075
    Louisiana70056080
    Virginia49547095
    Georgia48541085
    Oklahoma390400103
    Alabama33031094
    S. Carolina36530082
    Florida908089
    U.S.94,64190,03695

    Upland Cotton prospective plantings are included in Table 2. U.S. Cotton acres are expected to be four percent higher than in 2023. Half of the Southeastern states have double-digit percentage increases, and the remaining states are near the previous year’s cotton acres.

    Table 2. 2023 Acres and Prospective Plantings for 2024, Upland Cotton (1,000 acres) 
     
    2023
    2024 Prospective
    Acres% of 2023
    Texas5,5505,50099
    Georgia1,1101,10099
    Arkansas510540106
    Mississippi400500125
    Oklahoma420500119
    Alabama380430113
    N. Carolina380390103
    Tennessee265300113
    S. Carolina210240114
    Louisiana120140117
    Florida8990101
    Virginia818099
    U.S.10,08310,470104

    Peanut acres are shown in Table 3. Overall, peanut acres across the nation are predicted to remain the same as in 2023. South Carolina and Mississippi have the highest percentage increase in acres, while Texas and Virginia have largest percentage peanut decrease in acres. 

    Table 3. 2023 Acres and Prospective Plantings for 2024, Peanut (1,000 acres) 
     
    2023
    2024 Prospective
    Acres% of 2023
    Georgia775820106
    Alabama175180103
    Florida160170106
    Texas22516071
    N. Carolina12412097
    S. Carolina7785110
    Arkansas3535100
    Virginia292483
    Mississippi1820111
    Oklahoma161594
    U.S.1,6451,651100

    Table 4 illustrates that soybean acres for 2024 is up three percent in the U.S.  Oklahoma has the largest increase in predicted acres, with Texas losing the largest percentage of acres in 2024.

    Table 4. 2023 Acres and Prospective Plantings for 2024, Soybean (1,000 acres) 
     20232024 Prospective
    Acres% of 2023
    Arkansas2,9803,100104
    Mississippi2,1802,250103
    Kentucky1,8301,950107
    N. Carolina1,6401,650101
    Tennessee1,6001,650103
    Louisiana1,0301,150112
    Virginia580630109
    Oklahoma460550120
    S. Carolina39535089
    Alabama35032091
    Georgia160160100
    Texas12510080
    U.S.83,60086,510103

    It should be noted that that these are only intended plantings, and the actual acreage will vary from these estimates. Weather, commodity prices, input prices, and availability will have an impact on the acres that get planted.


    Source: https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/x633f100h/31980870j/fj237r16t/pspl0324.pdf


    Runge, Max. “2024 Prospective Plantings for Southern Ag Today States.” Southern Ag Today 4(15.3). April 10, 2024. Permalink

  • EQIP Overview for Livestock Producers

    EQIP Overview for Livestock Producers

    Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) has been a very popular program with livestock producers for many years.  EQIP is a working lands conservation program administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to provide conservation programs for farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners. It’s meant to help producers improve water and air quality, build healthier soils, and improve wildlife habitats by providing both financial and technical assistance. The good news for livestock producers is that fifty percent of the EQIP funding is mandated for livestock related practices. 

    Some practices that cattle producers may find beneficial are fencing, cross fencing, forage harvest management, heavy use area protection (gates, feeding areas), herbaceous weed control, pasture and hay planting, nutrient management, livestock shelter protection, prescribed grazing, watering facilities.

    Other practices that are livestock related are in the following list. (This is not a complete list.)

    Access control

    Animal mortality management

    Brush management 

    Composting facility 

    Conservation Crop Rotation

    Constructed Wetland

    Contour Farming 

    Dam

    Energy Efficient Agricultural Operation, Insulation, lighting

    Firebreak

    Groundwater testing

    Irrigation 

    Land Clearing

    Livestock Pipeline

    Obstruction Removal

    Organic Management

    Pond

    Short term storage of Animal waste and By-products

    Silvopasture

    Sinkhole Treatment

    Stream crossing

    Watering Well

    Woody Residue treatment 

    Many of the eligible practices might also overlap with production systems related to carbon payment opportunities.  If you are thinking about carbon options, it might be worth exploring the potential for EQIP participation.  Several past SAT articles have discussed carbon programs and contracts here.   

    There are many practices that NRCS can provide financial and/or technical assistance that is beneficial for environment and sustainability. Look at the EQIP page for more information.

    https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-initiatives/eqip-environmental-quality-incentives

    Here are some important points to keep in mind in learning more about EQIP.  

    To get started, you need to register with the Farm Service Agency to participate in the USDA programs. 

    https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/Outreach/pdfs/Brochures/4%20Steps%20to%20Assistance.pdf

    Even though the deadline for signing up for is typically the end of October or early November, producers are encouraged to sign up any time during the year.

    Available practices and practice standards can vary by state and by year so check with you local NRCS office to see what is available in your area. State contacts can be found at:

    https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/conservation-basics/conservation-by-state

    Finally, get to know you’re the local USDA staff at your USDA service center or offices. They can provide valuable information on how best to get assistance for the programs that are offered.


    Runge, Max. “EQIP Overview for Livestock Producers.Southern Ag Today 3(52.2). December 26, 2023. Permalink

  • Historic Research Yields Modern Solutions

    Historic Research Yields Modern Solutions

    The Land Grant University System has a historic tradition of the combined missions of teaching, research, and extension.  In fact, Southern Ag Today was born out of a collaboration of Extension Economists across the Southern region.  The Old Rotation at Auburn, is a great example of Land Grant history and continued relevance.  As cited from the National Register of Historic Places, January 14, 1988:

     The Old Rotation

    Established in 1896 by Professor J.F. Duggar, the Old Rotation at Auburn University is: 

    • The oldest, continuous cotton experiment in the U.S.
    • The 3rd oldest continuous field crop experiment in the U.S.
    • The 1st experiment to demonstrate the benefits of rotating cotton with other crops to improve yields and utilize nitrogen-restoring legumes in a cotton-production system. It continues to document the long-term effect of these rotations in the same soil.

    The Old Rotation has had 128 years of cotton planted in the same soil and provides valuable insight into cover crops and crop rotation, and one of the original objectives of utilizing legume cover crops is significant today.

    Table 1 shows yields from 1896 through 2023 from plot # 6 and plot # 8  (there are a total of 13 plots with different treatments). Plot # 6 has been planted to continuous cotton with no additional Nitrogen (N) fertilizer and no cover crop.  Plot # 8 was also planted in continuous cotton with no added N, but included a winter legume cover crop consisting of crimson clover and hairy vetch.  The plots have otherwise been treated the same over the research period.  It is also important to note that these are non-irrigated plots; there are years with very low or no yields; and the yields have increased significantly due to improved management practices and genetics. 

    The yield difference over the last 100 years is clear and substantial.  However, the yields between 1896 and 1921 were virtually the same, so it took some time for the net benefit of the practice to accumulate.  Much has changed about cotton production in 128 years, but the history of The Old Rotation suggests the reasonable conclusion that good soil and fertility management (or the lack of) is a long term game.    

    With more emphasis on improving soil health and reducing fertilizer costs in the Southern region, looking at long term research helps to provide solutions.

    More information about the Old Rotation can be found at: https://agriculture.auburn.edu/research/cses/the-old-rotation/


    Runge, Max. “Historic Research Yields Modern Solutions.Southern Ag Today 3(47.3). November 22, 2023. Permalink

  • All Markets are Local

    All Markets are Local

    What’s the price of hay? An adage that I often hear is that all markets are local. This is especially true for the hay market.  Numerous factors influence the local price of hay including but not limited to supply and demand, weather, quality, storage, age, variety, and delivery costs. In other words, the answer to what’s the price of hay is “it depends!”

    Figure 1, Monthly Hay Price Received (excluding Alfalfa) from January 2021 through July of 2023 shows the average price of hay for selected states and the U.S. average. Hay prices for the states of Kentucky, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas are included. These are the states that have monthly hay prices reported by USDA NASS Quick Stats. 

    Keep in mind the adage that all markets are local, especially the hay market.  Hay is trucked from where it is plentiful and cheaper to where it’s in short supply.  Shipping and arbitrage makes hay prices move together.  The Missouri and Oklahoma hay prices, on average, are 40% and 46% respectively, lower than the U.S. average hay price. The Kentucky and Texas prices trend very close to the U.S. average price.  The effect of summer drought in Texas and the Southwestern areas of the U.S. is reflected by the increased hay prices across all the states and the U.S. at the beginning of the summer of 2022.

    These monthly prices from USDA NASS can be useful in looking at season and/or long-term trends. For more timely prices check weekly hay prices at:

    https://www.ams.usda.gov/market-news/hay-reports

    Runge, Max. “All Markets are Local.Southern Ag Today 3(39.2). September 26, 2023. Permalink

  • Bermuda Grass Hay Nutrient Removal

    Bermuda Grass Hay Nutrient Removal

    What is the value of the nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium that is removed when hay is baled and carried away from the field? In March, we looked at wheat straw nutrient removal1, but the value of nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium should also be considered in hay production.

    Baling and removing 8,000 pounds of Bermuda grass hay over the course of a hay season removes 400 pounds of nitrogen (N), 90 pounds of phosphorus (P2O5), and 345 pounds of potash (K2O) per acre2. Prices of $0.71 per pound of nitrogen, $0.73 per pound of phosphorus, and $0.61 per pound of potash3 were used to reflect the approximate value of the nutrients. The table below shows the value of the N, P2O5, and K2O removed on a per acre basis when 8,000 pounds of Bermuda grass hay is removed. The value of the nutrients removed by the Bermuda grass hay is $561.61 per acre per year. Or on a 1200-pound round bale basis, that value is $54.24 per bale. Adding the cost of baling (1200 lbs. round bale) of $14.504 per bale and moving4 the bales out of the field at $4.35 per bale brings the total costs to $103.09 per 1,200-pound bale.  Converting these values to a per ton basis (4 tons/acre), the nutrient value is $140.40 per ton, and baling and moving is an additional $31.42 per ton. The total per ton costs are $171.82.

    It should be noted that this is just the value of N, P, and K, as there are some micronutrients that are removed as well. 

    There are caveats. The amount of hay harvested, costs of nutrients, baling and moving will likely be different depending on numerous factors, including location, yield, type of bales, the efficiency of the baler, and soil type. Check local resources in your area to estimate the value/cost of the nutrients and baling costs. 

    Information for the values included in this article can be found in the following resources.

    1.    https://southernagtoday.org/2023/03/29/wheat-straw-nutrient-removal/

    2.   https://www.aces.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ANR-0449.REV_.3.pdf

    3.    https://www.ams.usda.gov/market-news/production-cost

    4.  http://agecon.ca.uky.edu/files/custom_machinery_rates_applicable_to_kentucky_2022.pdf

     N (Nitrogen)P2O5
    (Phosphorus)
    K2O
    (Potash)
    Pounds/acre removed40092345
    Nutrient price/pound$.71$.73$.61
    Nutrient value removed$284.00$67.16$210.45
        
    Total Value of Nutrient Removal$561.61/acre or $84.24/ 1200 lb. round bale