Author: Natalie Graff

  • Government Incentives for Agricultural Generational Transfer? 

    Government Incentives for Agricultural Generational Transfer? 

    A transition plan outlines the process of transferring an agricultural operation from one generation to the next and includes details regarding transfer of both management (succession plan) and assets (estate plan).  Surveys and anecdotal evidence report low success rates for farm transitions and argue inadequate transfer plans or lack of a transfer plan explain the low success rates of agricultural operation survival, despite most producers’ desire to keep their farm or ranch in one piece and in the family.  Transition planning is difficult for many reasons, both logistical (requires time and resources such as accounting and/or legal help) and psychological (brings up thoughts of mortality and often involves tough decisions and conversations); therefore, producers tend to delay planning altogether.  

    We surveyed U.S. ranchers regarding plans to transition their ranch to the next generation and received a total of 148 responses, mostly from Texas (66.9%) producers.  Survey participants shared information about their operational structure, family dynamics, and details of their ranch transition plans or roadblocks preventing them from developing a plan.  Less than 40% of survey participants have a transition plan in place.  

    Chi-square tests for independence revealed relationships between some characteristics and the presence of a transition plan.  Results indicate a positive relationship between operational structure and succession planning, i.e., producers who have put in time and effort to organize their operation beyond a sole proprietorship are more likely to have a succession plan.  Results also indicate age and net worth each have a positive relationship with succession planning – we observed an increasing percent of respondents with a succession plan as net worth increased, until net worth reached $15,000,000.  

    Survey participants answered open-ended questions regarding their transition plans and roadblocks to planning – responses are summarized in Table 1.  Operational longevity in agriculture depends on the ability of farms and ranches to survive from one generation to the next.  Since evidence shows this process has proven difficult for producers, is there a role for the government to play in incentivizing the generational transfer of agricultural operations? 

    Table 1. Survey Results – Transition Planning Themes and Roadblocks

    Transition Planning ThemesRoadblocks to Transition Planning
    Utilizing a trust to protect and transfer control of assetsResistance from senior generation
    Plans to transfer ranch assets and management to on-farm heirs and personal assets of off-farm heirsLack of time or making time to plan
    Utilizing an LLC, corporation, or partnership to facilitate lifetime transfer of operationLack of knowledge/education in transition planning
    Utilizing an LLC, corporation, or partnership to create membership agreements and set restrictionsFinding professional legal/accounting help
    Lifetime, or inter vivos, transfer of shares (or interest) in the operation to heirs, whether purchased or gifted to the upcoming generationLegal fees
    Equitably dividing assets between on-farm and off-farm heirs
    Lack of a successor
    Difficulty managing lots of owners
    Difficult family dynamics/communication
    Difficult land or asset structure
    Estate tax considerations

    Graff, Natalie. “Is there a role for the government in incentivizing the generational transfer of agricultural operations?Southern Ag Today 4(25.4). June 20, 2024. Permalink

  • ARC-IC Considerations for 2022 Farm Program Elections

    ARC-IC Considerations for 2022 Farm Program Elections

    The farm program election deadline for 2022 is March 15th, and producers have the option to enroll commodities in Price Loss Coverage (PLC) or Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC).  PLC protects against declines in prices, and ARC protects against revenue losses at the county level (ARC-CO) or individual farm level (ARC-IC).  Among Southern producers, ARC-IC has not been popular in previous program elections, accounting for less than 1 percent of farm signups.  However, for the 2022 crop year, producers are making their farm program decisions at a time with relatively high commodity prices.  In this situation, it is unlikely that PLC will provide much support, and only alternatives that include yield losses will likely trigger support (ARC-CO and ARC-IC).  This begs the question of whether producers should consider ARC-IC for 2022.  ARC-IC differs from ARC-CO in the following ways: 

    1. The ARC-IC benchmark revenue is determined by a producer’s individual farm yields rather than county average yields. 
    2. ARC-IC election is made by Farm Service Number (FSN) rather than by commodity, i.e., if ARC-IC is selected for a FSN, then all commodities on that FSN are enrolled in ARC-IC.  If multiple FSNs are enrolled in ARC-IC, they will be treated as one “ARC-IC Farm.” 
    3. An ARC-IC payment is made on 65% of base acres rather than 85% for ARC-CO.
    4. Coverage applies to commodities with planted acres rather than base acres, i.e., if a producer has seed cotton base but plants corn in 2022, the ARC-IC benchmark revenue will be determined by corn prices and yields. 

    In addition to the ARC-CO/PLC decision tool, Texas A&M University offers a spreadsheet calculator for producers considering ARC-IC available at www.afpc.tamu.edu.  For the ARC-IC calculator, producers will need the information in Table 1.  Producers can utilize the calculator to compare potential ARC-IC payments with different combinations of FSNs and different price and yield expectations. 

    Table 1. ARC-IC Calculator Inputs

    Graff, Natalie, and Joe Outlaw. “ARC-IC Considerations for 2022 Farm Program Elections“. Southern Ag Today 2(4.4). January 20, 2022. Permalink