Author: Yangxuan Liu

  • Cotton Crop Insurance: Unveiling Regional Differences in Projected and Harvest Prices

    Cotton Crop Insurance: Unveiling Regional Differences in Projected and Harvest Prices

    Updated February 8, 2024

    Crop insurance is a tool that helps farmers manage the risks linked to lower yields or revenue in agriculture. The prices used in determining crop insurance indemnities are established in the projected and/or harvest price discovery periods each year. The projected price is determined for each crop by taking an average of the daily closing futures prices across a 30-day window in early spring, when crop planting would normally occur, for a given crop’s harvest month contract. Similarly, the harvest price is determined for each crop by taking an average of the daily closing futures prices across a 30-day window in the fall, when harvest would normally occur for a given crop’s harvest month contract.

    These price discovery periods vary across states and locations due to the timing of planting for each location. Projected and harvest prices for upland cotton hinge on the average daily settlement price of the Inter Continental Exchange (ICE) December futures contract for cotton during the price discovery periods. Commodity Exchange Price Provisions (CEPP) list the variance in price discovery periods across states and locations, aligned with distinct sales closing dates for each specific area, as Table 1 illustrates. Our recent article on Southern Ag Today delved into the regional variations surrounding the Sales Closing Date. Texas, being a sizable state, notably features three distinct Sales Closing Dates. The projected and harvest prices are published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency no later than three business days following the end of the price discovery period.

    Projected prices are used when determining the indemnity for yield policies for upland cotton, while both projected and harvest prices are used in determining indemnity for revenue policies. For a comprehensive breakdown of yield protection versus revenue protection policies for upland cotton, refer to Table 1 in Chong, Liu, and Biram (2023). Producers opting for revenue protection policies can choose between the default plan or the harvest price exclusion (HPE) option (Chong and Liu, 2023). Both the default plan and HPE use the projected price to calculate the value of the production guarantee at the beginning of the season. Similarly, both the default plan and HPE use the harvest price to determine the value of the crop actually produced at the end of the season. The difference between the two plans is that the default plan recalculates the value of the production guarantee at the end of the season if the harvest price is higher than the projected price (but no additional premium is owed), while HPE does not recalculate the guarantee.

    In insurance plans featuring HPE, since indemnity calculations rely solely on the projected price, these policies typically come with lower premium costs for producers. One frequent query from producers revolves around choosing between the options—with or without HPE. Figure 1 illustrates the ratio between the harvest price and projected price for upland cotton, from 2011 to 2023, across various projected price and harvest price discovery periods. When the ratio is higher than one, it signifies that the harvest price exceeds the projected price. For example, according to Figure 1.A, cotton harvest prices exceeded projected prices in 6 years out of 13 years. These graphs serve as a tool for producers to make informed decisions regarding their insurance, helping them weigh between the default option and the HPE option.

    Table 1. Projected Price and Harvest Price Discovery Periods for Upland Cotton among Different Regions Based on the Sales Closing Date

       
     Projected Price Discovery PeriodHarvest Price Discovery Period
    StateBeginning DateEnding DateBeginning DateEnding Date
         
    January 31 Sales Closing Date
    TexasDec 15Jan 14Sep 1Sep 30
         
    February 28 Sales Closing Date
    AlabamaJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    ArizonaJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    ArkansasJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    CaliforniaJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    FloridaJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    GeorgiaJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    LouisianaJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    MississippiJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    North CarolinaJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    South CarolinaJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
    TexasJan 15Feb 14Oct 1Oct 31
         
    March 15 Sales Closing Date
    KansasFeb 1Feb 28Nov 1Nov 30
    MissouriFeb 1Feb 28Oct 1Oct 31
    New MexicoFeb 1Feb 28Nov 1Nov 30
    OklahomaFeb 1Feb 28Nov 1Nov 30
    TennesseeFeb 1Feb 28Oct 1Oct 31
    TexasFeb 1Feb 28Oct 1Oct 31
    VirginiaFeb 1Feb 28Oct 1Oct 31
    *February 28 Ending Date is extended to February 29 in leap years. 

    Figure 1. The ratio of harvest price (HP) to projected price (PP) for cotton insurance policies across various price discovery periods from 2011 to 2023.

    Data Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Price Discovery Reporting Tool. https://prodwebnlb.rma.usda.gov/apps/PriceDiscovery

    Reference:
    Chong, Fayu, and Yangxuan Liu. “Cotton Crop Insurance to Protect Against Revenue Losses: Select Harvest Price Exclusion or Not?” Southern Ag Today 3(3.3). January 18, 2023. 

    Chong, Fayu, Yangxuan Liu, and Hunter Biram. “Exploring Diverse Crop Insurance Options for Cotton Producers.” Southern Ag Today 3(51.3). December 20, 2023. Permalink

    Liu, Yangxuan, Hunter Biram, and Fayu Chong. “Cotton Crop Insurance: Regional Differences in Sales Closing Dates and Cancellation Dates.” Southern Ag Today 4(3.3). January 17, 2024. Permalink

    USDA Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, Commodity Exchange Price Provisions, Section II – Cotton. 24-CEPP-0021, Released June 2023. 

    https://rma.usda.gov/-/media/RMA/Policies/CEPP/2024/Commodity-Exchange-Price-Provisions—Cotton-24-CEPP.ashx

    U.S. Department of Agriculture. Price Discovery Reporting Tool. https://prodwebnlb.rma.usda.gov/apps/PriceDiscovery


    Liu, Yangxuan, Fayu Chong, and Hunter Biram. “Cotton Crop Insurance: Unveiling Regional Differences in Projected and Harvest Prices.Southern Ag Today 4(4.3). January 24, 2024. Permalink

  • Cotton Crop Insurance: Regional Differences in Sales Closing Dates and Cancellation Dates

    Cotton Crop Insurance: Regional Differences in Sales Closing Dates and Cancellation Dates

    Updated February 8, 2024

    Navigating crop insurance for upland cotton can be complex, with various options and critical timelines. Our previous Southern Ag Today article discusses crop insurance policies available for upland cotton (Chong, Liu, and Biram, 2023). This article highlights essential dates for upland cotton producers to track to ensure effective management and protection of their investments.

    Securing federal crop insurance coverage relies on adhering to critical timelines and dates associated with these policies. Keeping track of these important dates can be challenging for producers since different crops have different decision deadlines. Among the crucial dates, producers must carefully track the sales closing date and the cancellation date for effective management. The Sales Closing Date is the last date to apply for or change crop insurance coverage from the previous year. Producers are expected to decide by this date on the type of policy and the level of protection. The Cancellation Date is the last date for producers to inform the insurance company if they do not want to renew their crop insurance for next year. Otherwise, their insurance policy will automatically renew for another year. 

    For upland cotton, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency (USDA RMA) has released important dates regarding the sales closing and cancellation dates for crop insurance. The sales closing date and cancelation and termination date are the same date for all counties for cotton, and they are also the same date among the different crop insurance policies available for upland cotton (see our previous Southern Ag Today article for a detailed discussion of the insurance policies available for upland cotton). Notably, these dates remain consistent annually but vary according to state and location, as detailed in Figure 1 and Table 1. Texas has been separated into three regions, each with a different date for sales closing dates and cancellation dates. For all the other states, the same dates apply to different counties in the state. 

    Producers can find these specific dates in their county through the USDA RMA Actuarial Information Browser and contact a crop insurance agent (see Agent Locator Tool offered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency) for more information regarding specific questions. 

    Figure 1. Regional Differences in Cotton Crop Insurance Policies’ Sales Closing Dates and Cancelation and Termination Dates 

    Table 1. Cotton Crop Insurance Policies’ Sales Closing Dates and Cancellation and Termination Dates by State and County

    State and CountyDates
    Val Verde, Edwards, Kerr, Kendall, Bexar, Wilson, Karnes, Goliad, Victoria, and Jackson Counties, Texas, and all Texas counties lying south thereof.Jan 31
    Alabama; Arizona; Arkansas; California; Florida; Georgia; Louisiana; Mississippi; Nevada; North Carolina; South Carolina; El Paso, Hudspeth, Culberson, Reeves, Loving, Winkler, Ector, Upton, Reagan, Sterling, Coke, Tom Green, Concho, McCulloch, San Saba, Mills, Hamilton, Bosque, Johnson, Tarrant, Wise, and Cooke Counties, Texas, and all Texas counties lying south and east thereof to and including Terrell, Crocket, Sutton, Kimble, Gillespie, Blanco, Comal, Guadalupe, Gonzales, De Witt, Lavaca, Colorado, Wharton, and Matagorda Counties, Texas.Feb 28
    All other Texas counties and all other states.Mar 15

    Source: Summary of Changes for the Cotton Crop Provisions (17-0021), U.S. Department of Agriculture

    References: 

    Chong, Fayu, Yangxuan Liu, and Hunter Biram. “Exploring Diverse Crop Insurance Options for Cotton Producers.” Southern Ag Today 3(51.3). December 20, 2023. Permalink

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Summary of Changes for the Cotton Crop Provisions (17-0021), November 2016. https://legacy.rma.usda.gov/policies/2017/17-0021.pdf


    Liu, Yangxuan, Hunter Biram, and Fayu Chong. “Cotton Crop Insurance: Regional Differences in Sales Closing Dates and Cancellation Dates.Southern Ag Today 4(3.3). January 17, 2024. Permalink

  • Navigating the “Winter” in Cotton Farming in 2023

    Navigating the “Winter” in Cotton Farming in 2023

    Cotton prices in 2022 were like a roller coaster ride, including increased volatility and the highest price achieved for the past decade (Figure 1). Multiple rapid market rallies in the cotton market were observed in 2022, followed by a quick withdrawal of speculative money, resulting in an immediate plunge in cotton prices after the rally. The highest daily spot cotton price for 2022 was achieved on May 4th at 149.76 cents per pound, and the lowest daily spot cotton price in 2022 was observed on October 31st at 72.26 cents per pound. Several factors contributed to the price volatility in 2022, including stock market volatility, soaring inflation, supply chain disruptions, rising interest rates, appreciation of the U.S. dollar, and severe drought in major cotton production areas.

    In 2022, the U.S. planted 13.6 million acres of upland cotton, the highest in 3 years. However, harvested acres are forecasted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to be only 7.7 million acres, indicating an overall U.S. abandonment rate for upland cotton of 43.4%, the highest on record. Severe drought conditions hit major cotton production areas, including Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri. The abandonment rate is estimated to be 68% for Texas which accounted for 58% of total U.S. planted cotton acres (7.9 million) in 2022. Due to drought, cotton production in the U.S. plunged in 2022 resulting in a 2.37 million bale year-over-year decline in cotton exports. The December 2022 USDA World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report projected U.S. cotton production at 14.2 million bales for the 2022/2023 marketing year, slightly below U.S. cotton demand – 12.3 million bales of exports and 2.2 million bales of domestic mill use. Globally, in 2022, cotton production is projected at 115.7 million bales, above the world cotton mill use at 111.7 million bales.

    Looking ahead, 2023 could be a challenging year for cotton producers. According to the International Monetary Fund October 2022 World Economic Outlook report, global economic growth is expected to slow down to 2.7%, combined with high inflation worldwide at 6.5%. The reduction in economic activity and high inflation in 2023 will likely continue to reduce consumer demand for discretionary items, such as textiles and apparel, thus suppressing cotton prices. 

    In response to high inflation, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate from about 0% in February to 4.25-4.50% in December. The interest rate increases were the largest since the 1980s. The Federal Reserve’s commitment to bringing inflation back down to its target of 2% will likely result in higher interest rates for producers in 2023. The bank prime loan rate has risen to 7.5% in December, up 4.25% since the start of 2022. Rising interest rates further accelerated the appreciation of the U.S. dollar. Cotton is a global commodity; on average, over 80% of cotton produced in the U.S. is exported. The appreciation of the U.S. dollar increases prices paid by foreign consumers and makes U.S. cotton less attractive compared to other cotton exporting countries with a relatively weaker currency. This could result in a further decline in cotton demand from the U.S. and lower cotton prices for U.S. producers in 2023. 

    U.S. cotton acreage and production are likely to decline in 2023, due to a lower relative price expectations compared to competing crops. Additionally, profit margins for cotton producers have been adversely affected due to high input costs and low prices. As of December 15, 2022, December cotton futures prices, CTZ23 (Dec’ 23), are currently at 79.29 cents per pound. An optimistic futures price for cotton in 2023 is 80 to 85 cents per pound, and a pessimistic price for 2023 is 69 to 75 cents per pound. For planning and budgeting projections, a price of 72 to 78 cents per pound is suggested for 2023. On a positive note, an economic recovery could occur in the fourth quarter of 2023, and the winter ice in the cotton market could start to melt during the cotton harvest in 2023. 

    Figure 1. Cotton Cash Prices for the past decade.

    Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    Yangxuan Liu

    Assistant Professor

    yangxuan.liu@uga.edu

  • High Abandonment Acres for U.S. Cotton Projected Due to Drought

    High Abandonment Acres for U.S. Cotton Projected Due to Drought

    Every year, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) releases its projected harvest acres for U.S. cotton starting in August. The report provides updated information about expected U.S. cotton production. In 2022, the U.S. planted 12.3 million acres of upland cotton, the highest in 3 years, which was mainly due to historically high cotton prices during the decision-making and planting window. 

    However, in 2022, the overall U.S. abandonment rate for upland cotton is estimated at 43.4%, which is the highest on record since 1953. The abandonment rate, which measures the percentage of unharvested acres compared to total planted acres, provides an estimate of the number of failed acres versus the number of acres that will be harvested. Severe drought conditions hit the largest cotton production regions in the Southwest (Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas) and the West (California, Arizona, and New Mexico). The abandonment rate for Texas (Figure 1A) reached 69%. Texas planted 7.1 million acres of cotton in 2022 –  by far the largest of any state – representing 57.6% of total U.S. planted acres (Figure 1B). By contrast, drought impacts were less severe in the Delta (Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee) and Southeast (Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia). 

    As a result of the drought conditions this year, upland cotton harvested acreage in the U.S. is projected at 7.0 million acres, which is the lowest amount of harvested acreage in over 150 years. The projected high abandonment rate in the U.S. reduced expected cotton production to 12.2 million bales, compared to the 10-year average of 16 million bales, according to USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service. If realized, it would also be the smallest U.S. crop since 2009. U.S. cotton demand (mill use plus exports) for the 2022 crop is forecast at 14.3 million bales, exceeding production. As a result, ending stocks in the U.S. are expected to decline to 1.8 million bales, the lowest on record since 1960. The low supply of U.S. cotton provides support for domestic cotton prices. For the 2022/2023 marketing year, upland cotton prices are forecast at 97 cents per pound. If realized, it would be the highest price on record since 1909. 

    Figure 1A. Abandonment rate for cotton-producing states in the U.S. in 2022

    Figure 1B. Planted acres and harvested acres of the cotton-producing states in the U.S. in 2022 Abandonment Rate = 1 – Harvested Acre/Planted Acre

    References and Resources:

    U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2022a. Production, Supply, and Distribution Database. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. Available online: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/

    U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2022b. Quick Stats. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Available online: https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/

    Liu, Yangxuan. “High Abandonment Acres for U.S. Cotton Projected Due to Drought“. Southern Ag Today 2(37.1). September 5, 2022. Permalink

  • What is Behind the Recent Cotton Futures Market Plunge?

    What is Behind the Recent Cotton Futures Market Plunge?

    The cotton futures market is on the decline, having experienced a dramatic selloff starting June 17, 2022. As shown in Figure 1, December 2022 Cotton Future prices dropped from the May 17, 2022 high of 134 cents per pound to around 120 cents per pound on June 15, 2022, only to be followed by a plunge to a low of 91.2 cents per pound on June 28, 2022. The selloff has created concerns among cotton producers about this year’s profitability. What was the cause of the recent market plunge? 

    Figure 1. December 2022 Cotton Future Prices for the Past Year

    Source: barchart.com

    Since September of last year, the cotton futures market experienced an inflow of speculative money, which pushed cotton prices to levels that exceed those indicated by supply and demand fundamentals (more information here). The flow of speculative money in and out of cotton markets makes prices unpredictable and volatile. However, with the recent speculative money leaving the cotton market, prices fell sharply, possibly with a temporary correction below the price supported by global cotton supply and demand fundamentals. What caused this sudden withdrawal of money from the cotton market? 

    Cotton and cotton-related products are discretionary items. Thus, cotton prices tend to follow the economy, with cotton prices rising during economic growth and declining during recessions. Many economic indicators point to the direction of a global economic slowdown, with the possibility of a recession in the United States. The S&P 500 index, one of the main indexes for the U.S. stock market, recorded a 20% drop in June from its January closing peak to confirm a bear market. Meanwhile, soaring inflation put extra pressure on consumers. The annual inflation rate in the U.S. accelerated to 8.6% in May of 2022, the highest since December 1981. Embedded in inflation, energy prices rose 34.6% and food costs surged 10.1%. Severe supply disruptions caused by geopolitical tension and Covid-19 reduced global economic productivity, hindered the ability to meet consumer demand, which resulted in an economic slowdown and high inflation rates globally. 

    The soaring inflation, especially for food and energy, reduced consumer confidence and forced the consumer to rebalance their budgets for spending. This could lead to consumers reducing the purchase of apparel and apparel-related products. Meanwhile, in response to high inflation, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate to tamp down inflation – on June 15th the Federal Reserve increased interest rates by three-quarters of a percentage point, its largest rate increase since 1994 and the third rate increase in 2022. The Federal Reserve’s commitment to bringing inflation back down to its target of 2% indicates a strong possibility of further interest rate hikes in 2022 and 2023. The rising interest rate further accelerated the appreciation of the U.S. dollar, as the U.S. Dollar Index reached its three-year high at 104.01. Cotton is a global commodity; on average, over 80% of cotton produced in the U.S. is exported. The appreciation of the U.S. dollar increases prices paid by foreign consumers and makes U.S. cotton less attractive. All of these concerns contributed to the withdrawal of money from the cotton market and the recent decline in cotton prices from the peak. 

    The impact of this year’s global cotton production on prices is yet to be seen. High cotton prices during the planting season attracted more cotton planted acres globally. However, the Southwest United States, the major cotton-producing region in the U.S., is experiencing severe drought and is anticipating lower production this year. Globally, the USDA June forecast for cotton production could reach 121.3 million bales, 4 million bales larger than last year. The projected USDA global ending stocks are maintained at a relatively low level at 82.7 million bales. Lower cotton production in the U.S. could provide some support for harvesting prices domestically. However, with a higher global cotton production forecast, global cotton prices could drop further if the global economy enters a recession and stock markets continue to experience losses for the remainder of this year. 

    Producers who are not in a marketing pool are encouraged to develop a marketing plan to protect the harvest price, as it is risky to lock in high input prices without a marketing plan for the crop. In addition, producers can adjust their harvest price expectations and manage their in-season production decisions accordingly.

    Liu, Yangxuan. “What Is Behind the Recent Cotton Futures Market Plunge?”. Southern Ag Today 2(29.1). July 11, 2022. Permalink