Author: Yuri Clemets Daglia Calil

  • Steer Dressed Weight: Recent Counter-Seasonal Behavior and its Long-Term Growth Trend

    Steer Dressed Weight: Recent Counter-Seasonal Behavior and its Long-Term Growth Trend

    Total beef production can be defined as the number of animals slaughtered times the average dressed weight. I’ll briefly discuss the steer dressed weight in this article, emphasizing its recent surprising behavior. Dressed weight corresponds to the weight of the carcass minus feet, head, hide, and organs (ERS/USDA). Figure 1 shows the atypical seasonal pattern so far in 2024 for the U.S. federally inspected weekly average steer dressed weight. The blue line exhibits the 2024 counter-season pattern when contrasted with 2023 (dotted line) and the 2018-2022 average (red line).

    Following a record high for the first week of January (937 lb./head), the dressed weight experienced a gradual decline until the fifth week of 2024, when it reached 909 lb./head. Winter weather helps explain this fall at the beginning of the year. However, instead of continuing to decrease, the dressed weight unexpectedly surged, reaching record highs for weeks 9 to 16. During this period (weeks 9 to 16), the steer’s average dressed weight was 921 lb./head, tallying 25 lb./head heavier than in 2023 and 32 lb./head more than the previous five years’ average.

    One of the key factors contributing to the recent increase in dressed weight is the surge in days on feed. The number of cattle on feed (COF) for over 120 days significantly increased, exceeding 4.9 million head in April, up by about half a million from last year. Meanwhile, the COF, for over 90 days, plateaued at around 6.6 million heads since February. As the cost of gain has dropped, producers tend to increase weights. But, keeping the yard full and packers slowing harvest schedules may be more important factors in dressed weights.  One by-product of heavier weights and more days on feed is the percent of carcasses grading Prime.  In fact, the percent of Prime carcasses jumped from 9.9 percent in the first week to 11.4 percent in the last week of April 2024 (Figure 2). More Yield Grade 4’s and 5’s is another by-product, but that is another subject.   

    In the short run, the dressed weight shows a counter-season pattern. Nevertheless, in the long run, the steer dressed weight exhibits an upward trend. Figure 3 illustrates this behavior, displaying an average increase of 4.95 pounds for every additional year (linear regression, dotted line). In 50 years, the average dressed weight has grown by approximately 30%. It means that nowadays, three steers produce almost the same amount as four steers in the seventies. Technological advancements, such as in nutrition, management, and genetics, help explain this phenomenal growth. 

    Figure 1 – Steer Dressed Weight, Federally Inspected, Weekly

    Source: NASS/USDA

    Figure 2 – Beef Graded Prime as Percent of Beef Graded, Weekly

    Source: AMS/USDA

    Figure 3 – Steer Dressed Weight, Federally Inspected, Yearly

    Source: NASS/USDA

    References

    AMS/USDA. (2024, May 10). Retrieved from: https://publicdashboards.dl.usda.gov/t/MRP_PUB/views/LPMeatGradingDashboard/GradeData?%3Aembed=y&%3Aiid=1&%3AisGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y

    ERS/USDA. (2024, May 10). Retrieved from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=77827

    NASS/USDA. (2024, May 10). Retrieved from: https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/

  • Ag Census Reveals Fewer Beef Cow Farms

    Ag Census Reveals Fewer Beef Cow Farms

    In the previous SAT livestock article, Dr. Griffith asked about the girls’ whereabouts. Last week, the USDA/NASS released the 2022 Agricultural Census. Every five years, the Census takes a snapshot of U.S. agricultural operations. There is a wealth of interesting insights in the census data.  The data also sheds light on the structural changes in beef cow operations. The decrease in beef cow ranches could slow future herd expansion. 

    Figure 1 highlights the decline in beef and milk cow farms. Between 2017 and 2022, 106,844 beef cow ranches disappeared, a 15 percent drop. In the same period, milk cow farms decreased by 34 percent. In contrast to the 2012 drought, we have fewer beef cow ranches to rebuild the herd, making it more challenging to find our girls. The contractions in cow farms are steeper than the overall number of farmers, which has declined by 6.9 percent, according to USDA/NASS. 

    Figure 1 – Number of Cow Farms: 2002 – 2022.

    Source: 2022 USDA/NASS Census

    Although there has been a decline in beef cow farms, the Census has reported an increase of 1,034 ranches with more than 500 head (Fig. 2). From 2017 to 2022, the beef cow herd has decreased by 2.5 million head. However, there has been an increase of 839,603 head in farms with more than 500 head. It indicates industry consolidation, providing insights into where we may find our girls.   

    Figure 2 – Number of Beef Cow Farms by Herd Size: 2017 – 2022.

    Source: 2022 USDA/NASS Census

    Beef cow farms shrunk across all farm size categories (Fig. 3). Most beef cow ranches are between 10 and 49.9 acres. Between 2017 and 2022, this category displayed the smallest drop, 9 percent, showing its resilience. But, during this period, the extremes recorded the most significant declines, producers with 1 to 10 acres declined by 23 percent, and 1000 to 2000 acres ranches declined by 20 percent. Regardless of the production scale, environmental, and economic factors affected beef cow ranches’ survivorship.

    Figure 3 – Number of Beef Cow Farms by Herd Size: 2017 – 2022.

    Source: 2022 USDA/NASS Census

    The 2022 USDA/NASS Agricultural Census reported a decline in beef cow operations from 2017 to 2022.  The census also reported some growth in larger operations.  The effect of fewer total operations on the speed of herd rebuilding remains to be seen.


    Calil, Yuri. “Ag Census Reveals Fewer Beef Cow Farms.Southern Ag Today 4(8.2). February 20, 2024. Permalink

  • Lamb And Mutton Production Shrinks This Year 

    Lamb And Mutton Production Shrinks This Year 

    Lamb and mutton production has followed the usual historical pattern this year, hitting a peak in Spring and increasing from Summer lows this Fall. Production peaked at the end of the first quarter, outpacing 2022 numbers. Then, production declined, reaching a low in July. In recent weeks production has exceeded that of 2022.  You’ll notice the sharp production decline in the chart indicating the Thanksgiving shortened work week.

    From January to November 2023, federally inspected (FI) lamb and mutton production totaled 102.1 million pounds. This represents a 2.7 percent drop compared to the same period of 2022. Despite that production decline, the number of sheep and lambs slaughtered jumped 3.4 percent, from 1.38 to 1.63 million head. Weight is the crux of the matter. Average FI live weight declined by 6.3 percent. Over the abovementioned period, the average sheep and lamb live weight dropped from 132.7 to 124.3 pounds. Likewise, dressed weight has decreased, on average, by 6%. Lighter weights reflect more, lighter hair sheep, lambs going to non-traditional markets at lighter slaughter weights, and likely fewer fed in feedlots this year.

    Total supplies include imports and cold storage stocks. The cold storage reached 26.1 million pounds in October, 9 percent less than the same month in 2022. Lamb and mutton imports plummeted 17.4 percent so far this year. From January to September 2023, the U.S. imported 174 million pounds. The country brought in 211 million pounds during the same period last year.

    Live lamb prices collapsed midway through 2022 and have spent most of this year trying to recover.  By mid-year 2023 lamb prices had recovered to exceed those of 2022. After that, national negotiated live prices have hovered at around $200 per cwt.  Even though prices have begun to decline in recent weeks, tighter overall supplies from domestic production, reduced imports, and less in cold storage have boosted prices above year ago levels.

    There appears to be renewed interest in lamb production in the South, based on questions some of us livestock economists here at SAT receive.  Price recovery should continue that interest over time and provide a boost to those who have started production.


    Clemets Daglia Calil, Yuri. “Lamb And Mutton Production Shrinks This Year.” Southern Ag Today 3(48.2). November 28, 2023. Permalink

  • Feed Inputs for Ranchers: A Brief Look at Corn and Hay

    Feed Inputs for Ranchers: A Brief Look at Corn and Hay

    In last week’s Southern Ag Today article, Andrew Griffith discussed whether the ranchers should feed or breed their heifers in the current market. He stressed the relevance of feed, capital, and labor costs. Here, I briefly discuss the prices of two crucial feed inputs: corn and hay. Along with pasture quality, these inputs are essential for herd recovery and expansion.

    While cattle prices continue to have an upward trend, corn markets show a different pattern. Global ending stocks (311.05 MMT) and plentiful production in the U.S. (15.1 B bushels) are driving corn prices down (Figure 1). Last August, corn prices hovered above $7/bu. Recently, corn is trading below $5.50/bu. Of course, lower corn prices boost feeder prices. 

    Figure 1 – 600-900 Feeder and Corn Prices: Aug/2022 – Aug/2023

    Source: USDA – NASS

    The price and availability of hay is also crucial to the decision to retain animals. Hay is the 3rd largest crop in the U.S. by number of acres harvested (USDA-NASS). Figure 2 contains U.S. average hay prices. Fertilizer and fuel costs swelled forage production costs and drought cut production in many areas of the country.  Higher hay prices than last year suggests we are still suffering from the effects of drought. 

    Figure 2 – Hay Prices

    Sources: USDA – NASS

    USDA’s latest hay production report indicates some growth in hay inventory. Nationwide, hay supplies are expected to rebound about 5 percent compared to last year.  But, longer term, hay production has declined 24 percent over the past 20 years. Yields have declined from 2.48 to 2.29 tons/acre during the same period. 

    While much of Louisiana and Texas remain in drought, most of the rest of the South is drought free. Less expensive feed and better pasture conditions may provide opportunity for some herd growth.  

    References

    Griffith, Andrew P. To Breed or To Feed? Southern Ag Today 3(34.2). August 22, 2023. Permalink

    USDA – NASS (2023). Available online: https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/

    Beef Cattle Decision Aids. Available online: https://agecoext.tamu.edu/resources/decisionaids/beef/

  • A Quick Look at Brazil’s Efforts to Outpace the U.S. as Leading Corn Exporter

    A Quick Look at Brazil’s Efforts to Outpace the U.S. as Leading Corn Exporter

    Ribera (2023) showed Brazil challenging the U.S. as the top corn exporter. Here, I explore this competition dynamic a little further. Figure 1 shows that most U.S. and Brazilian exports occur at different times of the year. U.S. corn predominates in the first half of the year and Brazilian corn in the second half. In the soybean market, the opposite occurs. I added soybean to the analysis because Brazil has two corn crop seasons yearly. The first one competes with soybeans for land.  

    Figure 1 – Corn and Soybean Exports: U.S. vs. Brazil

    Figure 2 – Corn and Soybean Prices

    Sources for Fig.1 and 2: USDA/FAS-GATS (2023) provides the U.S. value and volume. MAPA-Agrostat (2023) provides the Brazilian value and volume. Prices are the ratio of value over volume. The bars show the harvest season for each crop and country, according to USDA/FAS -IPAD (2023). Green bars correspond to harvest season in Brazil. Red bars account for harvest season in the U.S. For Brazilian corn, the light green bar indicates the first crop, and dark green the second crop.  

    Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento CONAB (2023) estimated 317.6 M. tons of all grain produced in Brazil for the 2022/2023 crop season. Soybeans and corn make up 88.9% of this total. However, the static storage capacity is only 192.4 M. tons. As a result, there is a total deficit of 125.2 M. tons. Figure 3 shows corn and soybean surpassing the static storage capacity. Indeed, the installed capacity can handle only 68% of the current year’s soybean and corn production.

    Figure 3 – Static Storage Capacity versus Soybean and Corn Production

    Source: CONAB (2023). The corn and soybean production for 2023 is an estimated value. 

    The storage capacity geographical distribution could be more convenient. The Midwest states, the leading producers, can store approximately 50% of the soybean and corn they harvest. Furthermore, only 15.5% of static storage capacity is within farms. As a result, most farmers need to sell soybeans or corn even if prices are not attractive. This intensified selling increases the downward pressure on prices. Such behavior may help explain the price differences in Figure 2. So, the lack of storage capacity may lead Brazil to a pyrrhic victory – champion of volume, but with lower prices.

    References

    CONAB (2023). Retrieved from: https://www.conab.gov.br/

    MAPA-Agrostat (2023). Retrieved from: https://indicadores.agricultura.gov.br/agrostat/index.htm

    Ribera, Luis. “Brazil Challenging U.S. Corn Export Top Spot.” Southern Ag Today 3(4.4). January 26, 2023.

    USDA/FAS-GATS (2023). Retrieved from: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/gats/default.aspxUSDA/FAS -IPAD (2023). Retrieved from: https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/ogamaps/cropcalendar.aspx