Category: Crop Marketing

  • Flat Global Demand and Increased Brazil Production Provide Challenges for U.S. Cotton Prices

    Flat Global Demand and Increased Brazil Production Provide Challenges for U.S. Cotton Prices

    Cotton futures prices have struggled to gain traction over the past six months. The last time nearby cotton futures were above 75 cents was June 28, 2024. Since July, nearby cotton futures prices have traded mostly between 66 and 73 cents. New crop (December 2025) futures prices are currently below 70 cents, which will not provide attractive pricing opportunities for cotton producers. Additionally, if new crop futures prices remain low through the crop insurance price determination period, the safety net will be diminished and will likely result in decreased planted acres in the United States. Global supply and demand have played a role in low cotton prices. Figures 1 and 2 show global cotton demand and Brazil cotton production which have contributed to lower cotton prices. 

    Global cotton demand has been flat for more than two decades and per capita cotton consumption has trended lower (Figure 1). Projected global cotton consumption for the 2024/25 marketing year is 116 million 480 lb bales, the same as 2010/2011. Competition with synthetic fibers has resulted in a lower market share for cotton and reduced demand. Improved demand will be essential if cotton prices are to improve. 

    Compounding the challenges for U.S. cotton producers has been the rise of Brazil. In the last ten years, Brazil has more than doubled cotton production from 7.18 million 480 lb bales to 16.9 million 480 lb bales (Figure 2). The rise of Brazil cotton production has provided substantial competition for export markets. The combination of increased cotton production and flat global demand will continue to weigh on global cotton prices. 

    Figure 1. Global Cotton Consumption and Per Capita Consumption, 2000/01-2024/25

    Figure 2. Brazil Cotton Production, 2000/01-2024/25

    References

    USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), Production Supply and Distribution. Accessed at:https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/home

    Barchart.com. Nearby Cotton Futures Contract. Accessed at: https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/CTH25/interactive-chart


    Smith, Aaron. “Flat Global Demand and Increased Brazil Production Provide Challenges for U.S. Cotton Prices.Southern Ag Today 5(5.3). January 29, 2025. Permalink

  • Export Challenges Drive Down Sorghum Premiums

    Export Challenges Drive Down Sorghum Premiums

    Sorghum prices have traditionally tracked corn prices, adjusted by a premium or discount primarily dictated by export demand. However, recent trends reveal a decline in sorghum premiums, driven by reduced exports, particularly to China.

    In late 2024, sorghum premiums experienced a significant drop. Figure 1 shows U.S. Average Prices Received by Farmers for Sorghum Minus Corn (January 1989 – November 2024). In August, the premium stood at 70 cents over corn but fell to just 3 cents by November 2024. Projections suggest that December could witness a negative basis. This trend has been particularly pronounced in Texas, where January 2025 prices showed a discount of 59 cents per bushel compared to corn (Texas cash average price for the North, Central, and South Panhandle, USDA, AMS, Market News). 

    Figure 1. U.S. Average Prices Received by Farmers Sorghum Minus Corn January 1989-November 2024(Source: NASS/USDA/Ag Prices 12-31-24)

    During the 2023/24 season, the level of exports increased along with higher production and lower domestic consumption. Production in 2023/24 increased to 318 million bushels from the previous year of 188 million bushels, a result of significantly larger harvested acreage and better yields. The exports-over-domestic-consumption ratio also increased to 3.00 alongside better premiums over corn (Figure 2).

    Figure 2. Sorghum to Corn (Premium or Discount) and the ratio of sorghum exports to domestic use. Source (Dr. M. Welch, USDA February WASDE, USDA, NASS Agricultural Prices)

    Looking ahead, USDA’s January WASDE projections anticipate a 23-million-bushel increase in 2024/25 production, along with a rise in domestic use to 125 million bushels. WASDE increased area harvested and projected yield for the 2024/25 season compared to their latest report in December 2024. However, exports are projected to remain steady at 220 million bushels. This results in a reduced export-to-domestic-use ratio of 1.76, implying a likely premium of just 2 cents per bushel using Dr. Welch’s model to calculate sorghum-to-corn premium or discount as a function of the ratio of sorghum exports to domestic use (Figure 3). However, we are five months into the marketing year and this ratio may change as the marketing year progresses and USDA revises sorghum domestic use and export estimates.

    Figure 3. Sorghum-to-Corn Premium/Discount as Function of the Ratio of Sorghum Exports to Domestic Use. Source: Dr. Mark Welch, USDA February 2024 WASDE and 2024 Ag Outlook Conference.

    The slowdown in Chinese sorghum imports has exacerbated discounts. As of January 2025, U.S. sorghum export sales commitments represent only 20% of the USDA’s projected marketing year exports, far below the historical average of 75% by March (Figure 4). This shortfall has driven premiums downward and widened discounts across various regions. With only 20% of projected exports committed by January 2025, achieving the USDA’s 220-million-bushel forecast appears challenging. The direction of trade policies and tariffs will influence U.S. sorghum exports. Whether this is positive or negative for sorghum prices is yet to be determined.

    Figure 4. U.S. Grain Sorghum Export Sales Commitments, 2024/25 MY. (Source: USDA, FAS, January 16, 2025). 


    Abello, Pancho. “Export Challenges Drive Down Sorghum Premiums.Southern Ag Today 5(4.3). January 22, 2025. Permalink

  • Corn Price Reaction to Changes in USDA WASDE Projections 

    Corn Price Reaction to Changes in USDA WASDE Projections 

    The January USDA World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report provided more revisions to the U.S. corn balance sheet. Revisions to USDA domestic corn estimates have been mostly positive for corn prices since the USDA’s September WASDE projections. This month’s revisions propelled March corn futures 20 ½ cents higher in two trading days, from $4.56 to $4.76 ½. Since the September WASDE, March corn futures have increased from $4.04 ¾ to $4.76 ½, a $0.71 ¾ increase. 

    Was the price increase justified based on the revised information? Yes. 

    Table 1 compares the USDA WASDE estimates in September to January for corn. The two primary changes were a decrease in the national average yield of 4.3 bu/acre (183.6 to 179.3 bu/acre), a 2.3% decrease, and an increase in exports of 150 million bushels (2.3 to 2.45 billion), a 6.5% increase. Driven by these two adjustments, projected 2024/25 marketing year ending stocks in the United States decreased 517 million bushels, from 2.057 billion to 1.54 billion bushels. A 25.1% decline in ending stocks, combined with the change in use, resulted in a decline in stocks-to-use from 13.7% to 10.2%. Small percentage adjustments to supply and demand can result in relatively large changes in stocks-to-use and the marketing year average price.

    Table 1. September and January USDA WASDE Projections for Corn for the 2024/2025 Marketing Year

     2024/25 Marketing Year Projections
     SeptemberJanuaryChange% Change
    Planted (million)90.790.6-0.1-0.1%
    Harvested (million)82.782.90.20.2%
    U.S. Avg. Yield (bu/acre)183.6179.3-4.3-2.3%
    Beg. Stocks 1,8121,763-49-2.7%
    Production15,18614,867-319-2.1%
    Imports252500.0%
    Total Supply17,02216,655-367-2.2%
    Feed and Residual5,8255,775-50-0.9%
    Ethanol5,4505,500500.9%
    Food, Seed & Industrial1,3901,39000.0%
    Exports2,3002,4501506.5%
    Total Use14,96515,1151501.0%
    U.S. Ending Stocks2,0571,540-517-25.1%
    Foreign Stocks 10,08210,008-74-0.7%
    U.S. Mrk. Year Avg. Price ($/bu)$4.10 $4.25 $0.15 3.7%
    U.S. Stocks/Use13.7%10.2%-3.6%-25.9%

    Stocks-to-use is one of the better predictors of the corn marketing year average price. In September, the USDA projected stocks-to-use at 13.7% and estimated the marketing year average price at $4.10, higher than the predicted value of $3.68 (Figure 1). In January, stocks-to-use were projected at 10.2% and the marketing year average price at $4.25, lower than the predicted value of $4.73. The muted response in the USDA WASDE price and the stocks-to-use predicted price can be partially attributed to the crop marketed between September and January.

    The key takeaway from the USDA revisions to projected corn supply and demand estimates and the futures market reaction:, the revisions justify the increase in prices. Based on current information, a reasonable nearby corn futures price trading range is $4.60-$5.10.   

    Figure 1. Corn U.S. Stocks-to-Use Ratio and Marketing Year Average Price 2006/07 to 2023/24

    References

    USDA World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report. January and September. https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/general-information/staff-offices/office-chief-economist/commodity-markets/wasde-report.

    Barchart.com. March 2025 Corn Futures Contract. Accessed at: https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/ZCH25/interactive-chart.

  • Record High Global Soybean Stocks

    Record High Global Soybean Stocks

    As soybean producers prepare for the upcoming growing season, global soybean stocks are exerting a bearish influence on the market. Currently, USDA projects the 2024/25 marketing year to have a record-high level of ending stocks at 131.87 million metric tons. If realized, this would be 17.62 million metric tons greater than the previous record high in 2018. The final estimate for ending stocks will depend on how the South American crop concludes. So far, Brazil has experienced favorable weather conditions, making it likely that it will achieve its estimated record soybean production this year. The outlook for Argentina is less certain.

    The majority of the increase in global soybean stocks can be attributed to one country (Figure 1). China holds the largest share of these stocks, with 46.01 million metric tons, marking an 83% increase since 2021. This growth accounts for 53% of the overall increase in global stocks during the same period. Brazil and Argentina have seen a 22% increase in ending stocks since 2021. In contrast, of the four major countries in soybean markets, the United States maintains the smallest amount of stocks at 12.8 million metric tons, but this still reflects a 71% increase since 2021.

    Another way to analyze ending stocks is by comparing them to a country’s annual usage, which can be illustrated through the concept of days-on-hand. Figure 2 shows the days-on-hand globally and for Argentina, Brazil, China, and the United States. Global days-on-hand are projected at 119 days, the second highest on record. Before 2022, China never had more than 92 days on hand but is currently projected to have a record 132 days of soybeans on hand. Argentina has increased from a decade-low of 152 days on hand in 2022 to a record 199 days on hand in 2024. The United States is projected to have 119 days of soybeans on hand, the second-highest figure since days-on-hand peaked during the 2018 trade war with China.

    Due to the current high levels of stocks projected by the USDA, soybean prices are expected to remain weak in early 2025. With a record crop expected from Brazil, the market is unlikely to see significant upward price movements in the coming months. While changes in weather conditions or harvest delays in South America could potentially drive prices higher, producers may have to wait until the market shifts its focus to the planting of the upcoming U.S. soybean crop before witnessing any substantial increases in prices. Given the uncertainty regarding future price direction, it is essential for producers to start preparing a marketing plan for the upcoming year and be ready to take advantage of profitable prices if they arise.

    Figure 1. Global Soybean Stocks by Country; 2019-2024

    Figure 2. Soybean Days-On-Hand; World and Select Countries; 2000-2024


    Maples, William E. “Record High Global Soybean Stocks.Southern Ag Today 5(2.3). January 8, 2025. Permalink

  • 2025 Crop Planning

    2025 Crop Planning

    Farming in 2025 will be challenging for many row crop producers. Low commodity prices, disappointing 2024 yields, high input costs, and policy uncertainty will require crop farmers to make important agronomic, financial, and risk management decisions. Below are a few points to consider during the planning process.

    1) Commodity prices are low and there is currently nothing on the radar that would indicate substantial improvement will occur in 2025. Drought (beyond just the southern region), production disruptions abroad, and geopolitics could improve price prospects, but at this point in time, increases in commodity prices are highly uncertain and mostly wishful thinking.

    2) Trade/retaliatory tariffs are a concern and provide the potential for substantial downside price risk in commodities that are heavily reliant on export sales, like soybeans and cotton. Protecting against downside price movements should be considered.

    3) Producers need to distinguish between cash versus non-cash costs (capital recovery) in the short term. We can farm in the short-term covering cash costs, but in the long term we need to cover total economic costs. 

    4) Input costs and profit margins need to be managed effectively – do not cut costs at the expense of yield but do not pursue the highest yield possible. Approximately 90% of cash costs are in five cost categories: land, seed, chemical, fertilizer, and operating expenses for equipment (fuel, labor, repairs and maintenance). Farmers should evaluate the efficiency of these five costs to assist in managing profit margins.

    5) Secure financing early. It will be a challenging year for many farmers to secure operating credit for 2025. Obtaining financing needs to occur as early as possible. Understand your financial position and how lenders evaluate credit applications. There are five main factors lenders consider: repayment, liquidity, solvency, collateral, and relationship. Which factors lenders emphasize, and the ratio or measure to evaluate the factor, will depend on the agricultural lender or credit provider. Talk to your primary lender early and often.

    6) Develop a marketing and risk management plan that includes crop insurance, storage analysis, contracts, futures, and options. Do not use the same marketing and risk management strategy in the current market environment as when we had higher prices and higher volatility two years ago.

    7) There is the potential for payments from the federal government (FARM Act? or other Ad Hoc legislation) and a new Farm Bill is possible in 2025. Until they are realized, it is not advised to incorporate these potential payments into the 2025 financial plan. If realized, they are a bonus.

    Due to the above challenges and the complexity of modern farming, it is essential for farmers to surround themselves with a strong support network. Important roles in farmer support networks include:

    Lawyer – Having appropriate legal advice is essential for agricultural enterprises. This can include a local lawyer for general legal matters but may also include specialized legal advice for more complex legal concerns. Paying for specialization is often cheaper in the long run. 

    Accountant – Nobody likes paying taxes, but it is essential for farmers to obtain assistance when preparing tax returns, planning purchases, or transitioning the farm to the next generation. A good accountant can save you money and assist if you have issues with the IRS. 

    Crop Insurance Agent – Crop insurance is the primary risk management tool for most crop producers. Crop insurance can be complicated to navigate and requires individual, policy-specific analysis to ensure you are receiving the most effective coverage for the premium paid. 

    Agricultural Lender – Agriculture is a capital-intensive business. Adequate and consistent access to operating and term debt is essential for most farmers. Having a primary agricultural lender that understands your operation and that will stick with you through agricultural cycles is imperative. This is not to say that all credit will be obtained through one lender. Farmers need to make sure that the cost of credit is fully analyzed and that decisions make financial sense. 

    Broker / Marketer / Grain Merchandiser – Marketing is not a strength for most farmers. However, in times of low prices and tight margins, marketing can be the difference between profit and loss. Obtaining expertise or a second opinion can be a tremendous benefit.

    Crop Consultant / Agronomist – Every production year is different and will require problem solving so a crop can be produced and sold. Yield is important; however, in periods of low prices and elevated input costs, it is essential that each input pulls its own weight economically. The cost of the input must be fully covered by financial benefits. A good agronomist can help navigate the agronomic challenges of the production season. 

    Extension Agent / Specialist – Extension provides a network to problem solve and connect producers with expertise to address problems and verify information independent of a financial motive. Searching the internet can be a powerful tool to assist in decision making. However, the internet has carpet bombed the information landscape with unreliable advice, opinions, and conspiracies, so be wary of information sources. 


    Smith, Aaron. “2025 Crop Planning.” Southern Ag Today 4(51.3). December 18, 2024. Permalink