Category: Crop Marketing

Updates in the October 2024 WASDE continued the overall fundamental market conditions in grains and soybeans (Table 1). Compared to the 2023/2024 marketing year, the factors of supply are increasing more than the factors of demand in 2024/2025. That results in an increase in the stocks-to-use ratio, measured here as estimated days of use on hand at the end of the marketing year [= ending stocks divided by (total use divided by 365)].  The days of use on hand measures how long we could get by next year on the crop that is left over from this year.  An increase in the number of days of use on hand indicates a larger supply cushion in case of a production shortfall, which puts downward pressure on prices. 

  Table 1. WASDE: U.S. Supply and Demand

Focusing more specifically on each commodity:

Corn. USDA increased the national average corn yield this month from 183.6 bushels per acre in September to 183.8, an all-time record high. The biggest changes to the supply and demand balance sheet came from increases in use in old crop, lowering the beginning stock number for the 2024/25 marketing year by 52 million bushels. Domestic use categories in new crop corn were unchanged, but USDA increased exports by 25 million bushels. 

World corn ending stocks were down slightly as the 1.6 million metric ton (mmt) increase in supply was exceeded by a 3.5 mmt increase in use. 

While the supply and demand numbers for corn were mostly neutral, the increase in use is a bullish sign. 

Wheat. The numbers for wheat in the October WASDE reflect crop information in the September Small Grains Summary: a small decrease in planted acres and yield. These changes lowered production slightly but were largely offset by an increase in imports.  The only change in use was an increase of 10 million bushels for feed.  

Only minor changes were made to estimates of world wheat supply and demand: supply down 1.9 mmt; use down 2.4 mmt; and ending stocks up 0.5 mmt.  

The report was slightly bullish for U.S. wheat with a small decrease in estimated ending stocks and a reduction in the days of use on hand at the end of the marketing year, down from a 154-day supply last month to 150. But the U.S. only accounts for 7% of the world wheat supply. The stocks-to-use ratio for world wheat this month was higher.   

Rice. Rice numbers were little changed this month, with a small increase in yield increasing supply and ending stocks. 

World rice production is up 3.1 mmt this month primarily due to an increase in India. The largest rice exporter in the world, India’s rice exports increased from 18.0 mmt last month to 21.0 mmt. This is the second highest rice export number for India, just below the record 22.0 mmt in 2021/2022.  

The report was neutral for U.S. rice supply and demand but bearish overall given the increase in foreign rice production with little change in use. 

Soybeans. The national average soybean yield was lowered by 1/10^th of a bushel to 53.1, still a record high. Along with this small change in production was a small increase in beginning stocks and small decrease in use. Ending stocks were unchanged. 

The world soybean balance sheet was mostly unchanged: supply down 0.2 mmt; use down 0.3 mmt; and ending stocks up 0.1 mmt.

With virtually no changes to U.S. or world supply and demand numbers, the October WASDE was fundamentally neutral for soybeans. 

---

Welch, J. Mark. “Recap of the October WASDE for Grains and Soybeans.“
Southern Ag Today 4(42.3). October 16, 2024. Permalink

As harvest continues to progress, farmers face the decision to sell or store soybeans. If soybeans are stored, farmers should evaluate the risks and rewards of holding soybeans priced or unpriced. Consideration should be given to both futures price risk and basis risk for individual locations. Holding soybeans in storage with no price protection is risky, as the value of the crop in storage has the potential to decline in value, while also incurring storage costs, such as interest. USDA projects Brazil’s soybean production to be a record crop of 6.2 billion bushels, up 10% compared to last year (USDA September 2024 WASDE). Brazil’s soybean planting season runs from September through December, with harvest occurring from January through May (USDA, FAS). As such, the price of U.S. soybeans held in storage will be strongly influenced by production risk during the growing season in South America. 

Figure 1. Three soybean pricing scenarios in Memphis, TN as of Oct 3, 2024 

This article examines three scenarios for pricing soybeans this fall.

1. Sell soybeans at the current cash price;
2. Store soybeans and establish a cash forward contract price for delivery in February; and
3. Buy a put option and sell a call option to fence in a futures price with delivery of soybeans to a cash market in February.

All futures market prices, premiums, and cash prices are for Memphis, Tennessee, as of October 3, 2024. Interest is assumed at an 8% rate.

In scenario one, the cash price was $10.21 (November Futures contract $10.46; negative basis of $0.25). This is the most straight forward scenario. The farmer sells soybeans and receives $10.21 (solid black line in Figure 1).

In scenario two, the farmer decides to store soybeans but wants to establish a price, so he enters a cash forward contract for delivery in February for $10.91. The interest cost to carry soybeans for four months is estimated at $0.27 ($10.21 x 8% x (4 months / 12 months)). Once delivered, the farmer receives $10.64 ($10.91 less $0.27 of interest expense; dashed black line in Figure 1). 

In scenario three, the farmer stores soybeans for February delivery and buys a $9.80 March put option for $0.13 and sells a $12.00 March call option for $0.13, making the strategy premium neutral, without including transaction costs. This strategy has fenced in a futures price (does not include basis) between $9.53 and $11.73 (solid red line in Figure 1). Change in the March futures contract will determine the outcome. Positions in the futures market would be offset by cash sales. If March futures are below $9.80, assuming 0 basis, the producer will receive $9.53 ($9.80 less $0.27 in interest). For March futures prices below $9.80, the put option would be exercised, establishing a short position in the futures market for the farmer. If March futures are above $12.00, the producer will receive $11.73 ($12.00 less $0.27 in interest). For March futures prices above $12.00, the call option would be exercised, establishing a long position in the futures market for the farmer.  March futures prices between $9.80 and $12.00 will result in cash prices between $9.53 and $11.73. March futures prices above $10.48 would provide a net price greater than the cash sale in scenario 1, and a March futures price above $10.91 would provide a cash price greater than the storage with a cash forward contract in scenario 2. An additional benefit of the options strategy is that the farmer can set basis immediately or any time prior to delivery of the soybeans to the cash market. The dotted red lines in figure 1 show how a positive or negative $0.25 basis would affect the cash price received under the fenced in futures price scenario. 

All three alternatives have advantages and disadvantages. Farmers need to determine their access to storage, price risk tolerance, and expectations for futures prices and basis for their market to evaluate which strategy is right for their operation.

References

Barchart.com. Soybean Futures and Options Prices and Premiums. https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/ZS*0/futures-prices?viewName=main

USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Country Summary. Brazil Soybean Area, Yield and Production. https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/countrysummary/Default.aspx?id=BR&crop=SoybeanUSDAUSDA September 2024 WASDE Report. https://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/wasde

As soybean prices for U.S. producers deteriorate, they face fierce competition from greater Brazilian production in the export market. USDA-WASDE projects the 2024/25 average farm price to be down $3.40 from two years ago, at $10.80 per bushel. U.S. soybeans rely heavily on the export market; on average, 47% of U.S. soybeans were exported in the previous five years. For over a decade, Brazil has maintained its position as the world’s largest soybean exporter, and in recent years, it has further expanded its global market share (Figure 1). USDA-WASDE projections for the 2024/25 marketing year estimate Brazil will account for 58% of global soybean exports, with the United States trailing at 28%. The remaining 14% will come from other exporting nations. While Brazil’s share has dipped slightly from last year’s peak of 59%, it continues to dominate the global soybean export market. 

The U.S. soybean market is facing challenges with Brazil strengthening its position as China’s primary supplier. China has been working to become less dependent on U.S. soybean purchases, and increased production has allowed Brazil to become the preferred trading partner. According to the Foreign Agricultural Service’s Beijing post, in the first nine months of the 23/24 marketing year, the U.S. accounted for 26 percent of China’s soybean imports, compared to 69 percent from Brazil. Reports also indicate that China is dealing with an oversupply of soybeans, as recent high purchases come during subdued feed demand. This fact has hampered sales to China as we enter the peak marketing season for U.S. soybeans. While U.S. sales to China have risen recently, they are still trailing behind last year’s sales and the five-year average. As of the week ending 9/19/24, the total soybean commitments to China totaled 6.8 million metric tons, compared to 7.4 million for the same time last year and the five-year average of 10.6 million.  

                  The export outlook for U.S. soybeans is further complicated by the prospect of low river levels on the Mississippi River, a concern highlighted in last week’s article “Low River Levels on the Mississippi River: Not the Three-peat We Want” (southernagtoday.org). Recent rainfall from Hurricane Helene has improved the river situation, as the Mississippi River at Memphis is expected to rise above the low river threshold. Without a positive shift in the current export scenario, U.S. producers face lower prices as they harvest a record soybean crop. With Brazil now dominating the export market, the potential for price increases this year depends heavily on the progress of Brazil’s soybean planting season. Although Brazil has just entered its planting window, dry conditions in the central region could lead to delays. If drought conditions develop, it could create an opportunity for higher prices for U.S. producers. Current forecasts call for rain over the next couple of weeks, but rainfall remains below normal.  

Figure 1. Share of Global Soybean Exports by Country, 2010-2025

References 

United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. Oilseeds and Products Update: Beijing, China – People’s Republic of China. CH2024-0116, 2024, https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Oilseeds%20and%20Products%20Update_Beijing_China%20-%20People%27s%20Republic%20of_CH2024-0116.

---

Maples, William E. “Brazil Expected to Continue Dominance of Global Soybean Exports.” Southern Ag Today 4(40.3). October 2, 2024. Permalink

The Mississippi River level measured at Memphis, TN, has dropped to severe low levels for the third year in a row. As of 11:35 AM on September 23, 2024, the river level fell to -10 feet. In the past ten years, the Mississippi River has fallen below the established zero level^[1] during harvest (i.e., August 1 through November 30) seven times. However, the level has only fallen to the “low” stage – defined by the National Weather Service as -5 feet – four times (2015, 2017, 2022, and 2023). The river level has serious implications for cash basis, or the local cash price offered by a grain elevator less the futures price traded on a global market.

Barge freight rates are established by the U.S. Inland Waterway System using a percent of tariff system. Benchmark rates are based on the tariff rates from the Bulk Grain and Grain Products Freight Tariff No. 7, entered into in 1976 between the U.S. Department of Justice and Interstate Commerce Commission (USDA-AMS, 2024).  While these rates are no longer directly applicable, they are still used to calculate the percent of tariff.  Calculating the percent of tariff consists of dividing today’s tariff rate by the 1976 tariff rate. The 3-year average percent of tariff rates indicates the weekly barge freight rate tends to be near 360 percent of tariffs, or about $11.23/ton^[2] (USDA-AMS, 2024). Low Mississippi River levels have a negative effect on corn and soybean basis through the barge freight rate (Figure 1). For example, the week of September 26, 2023, the barge freight rate was 1,689 percent of tariff, or $53.03/ton, which means the cost to transport grain from Cairo, IL, or Memphis, TN, to the port of New Orleans was four times higher than the three-year average for the same week. 

Figure 1. The relationship between the Mississippi River level and barge freight rates for moving cargo from Cairo, IL or Memphis, TN 

Figure 1 plots the Mississippi River level measured at Memphis, TN, for the period August 1, 2023, through September 3, 2024. This figure also provides the weekly average freight, as well as the expected barge freight rate measured by the non-drought three-year average freight rate (i.e., 2019-2021). As the gage height falls, barge freight rates increase, and vice versa.

The relationship between the futures price and the price at local cash markets can change abruptly due to economic or environmental events, such as low river levels. Local cash bids offered by elevators on the Mississippi River tend to be influenced by river level in periods of drought, because it is more expensive to ship the same amount of grain in more loads due to reduced barge draft (Biram, et al., 2022; Biram, 2023; Gardner, Biram, and Mitchell, 2023). Figure 2 shows the soybean basis response to low river levels in Helena, AR, in 2022 and 2023 with another downward trajectory for 2024 as of September 20, 2024.

Figure 2. Daily Soybean Basis at Helena, AR in Harvest Window

Figure 2 shows the historical daily basis for soybeans during the months of July through November. The blue, orange, purple, and green lines denote the 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 crop years, respectively. The solid red line denotes the non-drought five-year average basis for a grain elevator in Helena, AR. The non-drought five-year-average provides the “normal,” or “expected,” basis. The dashed vertical line denotes the basis most recently reported (-26) on September 10, 2024, which is 5 cents below the five-year-average basis of -31 cents.

While it may appear that the current basis in the heart of the Midsouth Delta region is similar to the non-drought five-year-average, this should be interpreted with caution. Upon closer inspection, the 2022 crop year also saw relatively strong basis at this time, but a steep decline followed. The relatively strong basis in the first week of September is likely due to only 30% of the midsouth soybean crop being harvested with the remaining occurring by mid-November, along with recent rains, including those from Hurricane Francine. 

A potential option farmers might have is to store grain in the bin and market grain in the post-harvest window as described at length in previous Southern Ag Today articles (Gardner, 2023; Gardner and Maples, 2023; Gardner, 2024). Historically, futures and basis tend to recover in the months when there is little domestic production to buy and stocks are drawn down. We note that the USDA Marketing Assistance Loan (MAL) program may be an additional tool to add to a post-harvest marketing strategy. A benefit to using MALs is the offered interest rates are below the market average saving potential interest expense. Since grain sitting in the bin is not paying off the operating loan taken at the beginning of the crop year, interest accrues on the operating loan, creating the opportunity cost of storage in addition to the explicit costs of handling and drying (Gardner, 2023; Smith, 2024).

---

^[1] According to the National Weather Service, silt may deposit in a river channel filling it up, or the channel may be washed deeper due to strong currents. Establishing a gauge zero level maintains consistency in river level measurements over time (National Weather Service, 2024).

^[2] This figure is found by multiplying the percent of tariff, which in this example is 3.60, by the benchmark rate for the Cairo-Memphis ports which is $3.14.

---

References

Biram, Hunter, John Anderson, Scott Stiles, and Andrew McKenzie. “Low Water Levels in the Mississippi River Result in Abnormally Weak Soybean Basis“. Southern Ag Today 2(45.1). October 31, 2022. Permalink

Biram, Hunter. “Flooding in the Upper Mississippi River is Associated with Relatively Weak Soybean Basis in the Midsouth.” Southern Ag Today 3(21.1). May 22, 2023. Permalink

Gardner, Grant, Hunter Biram, and James Mitchell. “Low River Levels, Barge Freight, and Widening Basis.” Southern Ag Today 3(39.1). September 25, 2023. Permalink

Gardner, Grant. “Interest Rates and Grain Storage.” Southern Ag Today 3(26.1). June 26, 2023. Permalink

Gardner, Grant. “To Store or Not to Store? Old Crop Exit Strategies.” Southern Ag Today 4(35.1). August 26, 2024. Permalink

Gardner, Grant, and William E. Maples. “River Levels and Off-Farm Storage Disbursement.” Southern Ag Today 3(43.1). October 23, 2023. Permalink

National Weather Service. “How can a river stage be negative?” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service. Accessed September 16, 2024. Permalink

Smith, Aaron. “Storing corn or soybeans: what is the futures market incentivizing?” Southern Ag Today 4(33.1). August 12, 2024. PermalinkUSDA-AMS. 2024.  Grain Transportation Repots. Available at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/transportation-analysis/gtr

---

Biram, Hunter, James L. Mitchell, and H. Scott Stiles. “Low Rivers Levels on the Mississippi River: Not the Three-Peat We Want.” Southern Ag Today 4(39.3). September 25, 2024. Permalink

The September World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report indicates modest changes in supply and demand for corn and soybeans. The World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB) increased their estimated corn yield by 0.5 bushels per acre, offset by a decrease in carryover from the 2023 marketing year. Soybean demand also saw a slight increase of 2 million bushels. Both cotton and rice yields were cut; however, the lower yield expectations were offset by lower demand, resulting in no change to the projected season-average price.

The remainder of this article focuses on corn and soybeans, which exceed trend yields by 2.6 and 1.2 bushels and represent a national high. Record yield expectations are driving stocks-to-use ratios (a key indicator of surplus) to levels much higher than in recent years. Consequently, the USDA has projected the marketing year average price for corn to be around $4.10 per bushel, while soybeans are expected to average $10.80 per bushel.

Currently, domestic consumption and exports of corn and soybeans appear to be stable. Crush (processing) and ethanol production are at or near record highs, while export demand is lower, but somewhat steady. Without a significant change in the yield estimate due to drought or overestimation, it is hard to envision a sharp price rise for the 2024/25 marketing year.

Figure 1 graphs stocks-to-use ratios and CPI- (inflation) adjusted season average prices for corn and soybeans with the September WASDE Estimates and associated trendlines (green and yellow with gray confidence intervals). CPI-adjusted corn prices are at their lowest level since at least 2011, and soybeans are nearing the lows seen in 2019. As a result, 2024 may be one of the toughest years for grain producers in the past decade, given the absence of a major event that could drive substantial price increases.

Figure 1: CPI Adjusted Price and Stocks to Use Ratio for Corn and Soybeans

Sources:

U.S. Department of Agriculture, World Agricultural Outlook Board. (2024, September 13). World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE). https://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/wasde

---

Gardner, Grant. “Minimal Price Gains Amid Record Yields: A Tough Outlook for Grain Producers in 2024.” Southern Ag Today 4(38.3). September 18, 2024. Permalink