Category: Farm Management

  • The Value of Proper Soil pH

    The Value of Proper Soil pH

    The increased cost of fertilizers has many users asking where fertility costs can be reduced.  Soil testing has long been recommended for farmers, ranchers, and homeowners to identify fertility levels and enable them to only purchase/apply that which is needed.  In addition to replacing the right amount of nutrients, it’s important to consider the conditions which make the most efficient use of existing and applied nutrients.  One component of a fertility program (and soil testing) that should not be overlooked is identifying and correcting low pH through the application of agricultural lime.  Agricultural lime is an investment that will leverage  high-cost fertilization by providing improved nutrient utilization in row crops, forages, and most other agricultural crops we grow in the S.E. United States. . 

    Figure 1. How Soil pH Affects Availability of Plant Nutrients

    Figure 1 shows the range of soil pH that provides that greatest plant utilization of the listed nutrients in the soil. If the soil pH is out of the target range, the nutrients aren’t utilized as efficiently. It should be noted that higher pH range may result in less utilization of some micronutrients.  It is important to know the major nutrient and micronutrient requirements of the selected crop or forage.

    There are various materials that are used for liming, and they have different attributes. Check with your supplier about what liming materials are available. Many states have regulations or laws associated with the characteristics and efficiency of materials that can be marketed as agricultural lime. 

    It typically takes one to two months after an application of a liming material before it becomes effective, so plan accordingly. 

    Producers should check with their land grant university for soil testing related information.  

    Runge, Max. “The Value of Proper Soil pH“. Southern Ag Today 2(19.3). Permalink

  • Extension Budgets and Budget Tools

    Extension Budgets and Budget Tools

    The Southern Ag Today team of editors and contributing authors are, for the most part, a group of Extension Agricultural Economics Faculty from the Southern Region Land-Grant University Systems.  Many of this same group are responsible for a decades-old tradition of publishing crop and livestock enterprise budgets in their respective states or regions.  Extension budgets are typically published early in the year before the growing season starts, and they serve a number of purposes.  The first is to simply provide examples of common practices used in region-specific enterprises, as well as to illustrate a possible set of revenue/costs expectations for the coming year.  Ag lenders sometimes rely on these budgets as benchmarks to compare loan applications and borrowers’ production plans.  Various state and federal agencies and other agricultural industry researchers may use these budgets to compare practices, costs, or expected yields across regions and over time.  However, most of us that contribute to creating Extension budgets would consider those as secondary benefits.  

    Extension budgets are best used as a planning tool, and even better if you make them your own with the published budget serving as a guide.  To that end, many of our budget projects also offer downloadable spreadsheets and other tools to create your own budgets.  The pre-season budget planning process offers a number of management benefits, including the ability to:

    • compare potential profits of various enterprises or production plans and choose appropriate crop mixes.
    • assess cost of production and break-even prices/yields; which help develop marketing plans and select appropriate levels of insurance.
    • conduct sensitivity analyses on specific items.  For example, determining the impact of recent fertilizer price increases on expected net returns and evaluating potential production plan adjustments.  

    Another benefit to a formal spreadsheet budget is the ability to do what I call active or continuous budgeting.  The idea being that the budget and the budgeting process does not end when the growing season starts.  As you progress through the production season, planned expenses become actual expenses while yield and price expectations are constantly changing.  Incorporating these in-season changes into your budgets as you go will keep you mindful of cashflow needs and will assist with ongoing production and marketing decisions.  The process will also sharpen your management skills and improve your pre-season production plans in future seasons.  

    To find budget publications and resources in your area, click below for your state’s Land-Grant University Extension program.  

    Alabama             https://www.aces.edu/blog/tag/profiles-and-budgets/?c=farm-management&orderby=title

    Arkansas            https://www.uaex.uada.edu/farm-ranch/economics-marketing/farm-planning/budgets/crop-budgets.aspx

    Florida  https://fred.ifas.ufl.edu/extension/commodityenterprise-budgets/

    Georgia              https://agecon.uga.edu/extension/budgets.html

    Kentucky            https://agecon.ca.uky.edu/budgets

    Louisiana         https://www.lsuagcenter.com/portals/our_offices/departments/ag-economics-agribusiness/extension_outreach/budgets

    Mississippi          https://www.agecon.msstate.edu/whatwedo/budgets.php

    North Carolina   https://cals.ncsu.edu/are-extension/business-planning-and-operations/enterprise-budgets/

    Oklahoma          http://www.agecon.okstate.edu/budgets/

    South Carolina   https://www.clemson.edu/extension/agribusiness/enterprise-budget/index.html

    Texas                  https://agecoext.tamu.edu/resources/crop-livestock-budgets/

    Tennessee          https://arec.tennessee.edu/extension/budgets/

    Klose, Steven. “Extension Budgets and Budget Tools“. Southern Ag Today 2(18.3). April 27, 2022. Permalink

  • Examining the Used Combine Market

    Examining the Used Combine Market

    Buying and selling equipment is an important aspect of row crop production. Combine purchasing and resale represent one of the largest decisions row crop operators must make. These decisions can impact the overall profitability of an operation. Used combine prices continue to rise as ongoing supply chain issues ripple through the economy. While rising costs are not limited to the pandemic era, it’s clear the lack of new combines, parts delays for older combines, increasing crop prices, and increasing fuel costs continue to be factors that impact equipment prices. 

    Pre-pandemic data suggested that the average price of a combine by age sold at auction has a wider dispersion for newer combines and 2018 prices were lower than 2017. Further breakdowns of the data found little variation in average prices of older combines while finding a larger spread as the machine became newer. These averages can be seen in the graph below. With the use of auction data from Machinery Pete, factors that impact these prices are examined and used to help farmers make more informed decisions about buying machinery. Some factors are common knowledge to most farmers, such as higher prices for certain manufacturers, locations, machinery conditions, and precision equipment. The data suggest a year in age on a combine would decrease its value by just under 10%, while 1000 hours would decrease the value by around 2%.  Interestingly, we also found that the statistical connection between age and value was stronger (more important) than that of hours and value.  Presumably meaning that the market is less consistent in terms of discounts/premiums for hours used, while the age of the combine was more critical in determining value. 

    As for the post-pandemic market, farmers looking to buy or sell used machinery should consider the following suggestions. When buying a combine, farmers can expect lower sales prices through consignment sales. While farmers selling used machines should list their combines through either on-farm sales or online sales. For farmers only willing to purchase certain brands or models, their searches will need to be extended beyond their local region, but expect an even higher price than in previous years. For farmers looking for potential machinery savings, consider a combine that is older than 3 years of age and be careful not to overpay for low hours. 

    Source: Machinery Pete Auction Data of Combines Sold in the US and Canada between 2015 and 2018.

    Data Link: Machinery Pete Auction Data

    Ellis, Robert, and Tyler Mark. “Examining the Used Combine Market.” Southern Ag Today 2(17.3). April 20, 2022. Permalink

  • On-Farm Cost of Contracting High Path Avian Influenza in a Commercial Broiler Flock

    On-Farm Cost of Contracting High Path Avian Influenza in a Commercial Broiler Flock

    As high path avian influenza (HPAI) spreads rapidly across the U.S., the on-farm financial ramification of an infection in a commercial poultry flock can be catastrophic.  This article is a follow-up to the recent Southern Ag Today article posted on March 29th, 2022, titled “The Cost of Avian Influenza to the Southeastern Broiler Industry.”  That article highlights that as of March 21st, 2022, there were 11,901,888 commercial birds destroyed due to HPAI.  Fifteen days later, that number has nearly doubled (22,851,072 as of April 5th, 2022).  While the continued outbreaks of HPAI have been mainly in commercial turkey and layer flocks, commercial broiler flocks are not immune to outbreaks.  

    Understanding the financial implications of contracting HPAI in a commercial broiler flock is critical and will hopefully highlight the importance of strict adherence to biosecurity measures. While the federal government provides financial aid to a grower for depopulation, cleaning and disinfecting, indemnity payments are only for the birds infected with HPAI.  It is important to note that the contract grower is not guaranteed 100% of the indemnity payment, as a portion can be distributed to the owner/integrator.  There is also no financial assistance provided for future loss of production while the contaminated area is cleared of the virus.  This timeframe could last more than 120 days and has lasting financial implications.  For example, the HPAI outbreak in a 12-house broiler operation in Kentucky in early February 2022 is not expected to receive new placements until August 2022.  A +120-day loss of operation could mean the producer loses income associated with 2-3 broiler flocks but still has the expenses of maintaining the facilities and making any payments on debts related to the operation.  With the lack of financial support from the federal government for future losses and no private insurance options, the farm-level financial impact of contracting HPAI is significant.  

    We examined the financial impact of contracting HPAI in a standard four broiler house (43 ft. x 600 ft.) operation in Kentucky with 32,300 broilers per house, a 56-day grow-out period, and 17 days to clean between flocks.  The loss in net farm income from contracting HPAI was $46,512, $97,658, and $158,348 for the loss of one, two, and three flocks, respectively.  This loss in net farm income could also be interpreted as the on-farm equity required to self-insure the operation from HPAI.  Therefore, early adoption of biosecurity measures is imperative as a financial risk mitigation method for a disease outbreak like HPAI.  Producers should also consider how they would manage this type of risk, should they be forced to deal with it.  

    References:

    Brothers, Dennis. “The Cost of Avian Influenza to the Southeastern Broiler Industry”. Southern Ag Today. March 29, 2022. Available online: https://southernagtoday.uada.edu/the-cost-of-avian-influenza-to-the-southeastern-broiler-industry/

    USDA-APHIS. “The HPAI Indemnity and Compensation Process”. Available online: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/animal_health/2016/hpai-indemnity.pdf

    Shockley, J.M., T. Mark, K. Burdine, and L. Russell.  “Financial Implications from Contracting Avian Influenza in a U.S. Broiler Operation”. Journal of Applied Farm Economics 3, no. 1 (Spring 2020). Available Online: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=jafe

    Shockley, Jordan. “On-Farm Cost of Contracting High Path Avian Influenza in a Commercial Broiler Flock“. Southern Ag Today 2(16.3). April 13, 2022. Permalink

  • Too Many Dollars Chasing Too Few Goods

    Too Many Dollars Chasing Too Few Goods

    After years of stable and low inflation and an almost unprecedented stretch of steady economic growth, our economy is now experiencing the highest inflation we’ve seen in over 30 years.  No doubt you have seen Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve System Board of Governors commenting on actions taken to curb inflation.  With recent inflation running in the neighborhood of 8% as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), response by the Federal Reserve (Fed) will continue to be front page news and will be critical to economic conditions moving forward.  In that light, I thought a brief overview of the players, tools, and terms might be helpful. 

    Inflation most simply defined is a general rise in prices of all things, including consumer goods, manufacturing goods, and labor.  The simple cause has been described as “too many dollars chasing too few goods.”  Right now, we have that problem from both sides.  Goods and labor are both in short supply, while there is an abundance of consumer demand and government spending (dollars eager to be spent).  Limited supplies of goods and labor push up prices and wages.  Higher prices and an abundance of dollars effectively lowers the value of each dollar.  Inflation is mostly problematic because it happens in “spits and spurts” with some prices rising faster than others creating winners and losers, instability, and economic uncertainty.  Uncertainty drags down consumer confidence, business investment confidence, and therefore economic growth.  The scary part about inflation is its ability to gain momentum as a vicious cycle or a self-fulfilling prophecy.  As people and businesses adjust to rising prices, they often do so by raising other prices to compensate for the increased expense.  People’s expectations also play a huge role.  If everyone expects inflation over the next year or two, their business negotiations and price setting choices will reflect their expectations and some portion of inflation can be blamed on the fact that people “thought” we would have inflation. 

    The Federal Reserve System is our country’s central bank responsible for managing, among other things, our currency, or the money supply.  From the Fed website, their purpose is providing “…the nation with a safe, flexible, and stable monetary and financial system.”  They have a few tools in their belt to manage the money supply, influence the value of the dollar, and keep a check on inflation.  In a recession or slow-moving economy, a central bank may push monetary policies described as expansionary or accommodative.  In other words, they are doing things to stimulate activity such as business investment, employment, and consumer purchasing.  In our current situation, to fight inflation the Fed has started actions to tighten the money supply, or what is called contractionary policy.

    By far, the tool you will hear the most about is what the Fed is doing with short term interest rates.  The Fed sets a target range for the Fed Funds Rate, which is the interest rate banks pay to borrow overnight funds.  As a benchmark, the Fed Funds Rate establishes the availability of money and influences other short term cash markets.  When inflation is driving down the value of the dollar, the Fed will increase interest rates to make borrowing more expensive, slowing down the supply of money to increase or support the value of the dollar.  Since the onset of the pandemic, the Fed Funds Rate sat on a range of 0.00% – 0.25%.  On March 17, 2022, the Fed bumped the range up a quarter of a percent to 0.25%-0.50%.  The have also announced their intention to continue increasing the rates steadily throughout the coming year.  They will often signal their future actions to avoid surprising financial markets, instill confidence, and dampen inflation expectations. 

    Open market operations refer the Fed buying and selling of treasury securities.  The buying or selling of short-term securities are moves used to help achieve the targeted Fed Funds Rate.  The Fed may also buy and sell longer term assets, such as 10-year Treasury Notes.  In either case, Fed purchases pump money into the system and the Fed holds the security as an asset.  On the other hand, if the Fed is fighting inflation, they may sell securities and park the cash on their balance sheet to effectively reduce the supply of money floating around in the economy with the intent to make each dollar more valuable.    

    On the surface the problem seems basic.  When there are too many dollars as we have now, you take some money out of the system.  In reality, the system is incredibly complex and drives much more like a barge than a sports car with the Fed nudging the money supply, interest rates, and the economy in one direction or another.


    Klose, Steven, and George Knapek. “Too many Dollars Chasing Too Few Goods.” Southern Ag Today 2(15.3). April 6, 2022. Permalink