Category: Livestock Marketing

  • Understanding Basis When Managing Feeder Cattle Price Risk

    Understanding Basis When Managing Feeder Cattle Price Risk

    Price risk management for beef cattle producers is an important tool in navigating cattle markets. As last week’s Southern Ag Today article on livestock marketing showed, many more producers are using Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) insurance, which correlates to program changes and a run up in cattle prices. LRP and many other price risk management tools, including futures and options contracts, mitigate futures price risk, however, it does not set the actual cash selling price for a producer. The difference between the cash price and the futures price is called basis. Basis varies from year to year, by time of year, location, weight class, and other factors.

    Figure 1. Range of Basis Values for 500-600 lb Steers in Georgia and the Average Range of Feeder Cattle Futures Prices, 2018-2022

    Source: LMIC using data from USDA-AMS and CME Group

    LRP and other price risk management tools that lock in a futures price still leave the producer exposed to basis risk. Producers are often more comfortable with taking on basis risk because basis risk is generally much smaller than futures price risk. Figure 1 presents the average range of monthly basis values and feeder cattle futures prices by month over the last five years for 500-600 lb steer calves in Georgia. As seen in Figure 1, the range of futures prices is much larger than the average range of basis values. Data from other states show similar gaps between basis variability and feeder cattle futures price variability.

    LRP, futures, options, and other price risk management tools provide protection from futures price changes but basis fluctuation may still affect the final cash selling price making it important to understand basis risk and to include it when making risk management decisions.  


    Secor, Will. “Understanding Basis When Managing Feeder Cattle Price Risk.Southern Ag Today 3(45.2). November 7, 2023. Permalink

  • Producers Embrace USDA’s Livestock Risk Protection Program

    Producers Embrace USDA’s Livestock Risk Protection Program

    Producers across the United States and the Southern States are increasingly adopting the Livestock Risk Protection Program, commonly known as LRP. This program, which is designed to protect ranchers against falling cattle prices, has witnessed a remarkable surge. From a mere 71 thousand head covered in 2017, the usage of LRP has increased rapidly to 5.2 million head by October 2023. In 2022, ranchers insured 3.4 million head, up from 1.8 million in 2021. Ranchers’ use of LRP in the Southern region has contributed significantly to this growth (Figure 1). As of October 2023, ranchers have insured approximately 1 million head annually through the LRP program, with Texas and Oklahoma insuring 56% and 34% of this total, respectively.

    Figure 1: LRP Usage in the Southern States

    This increase occurs alongside increases in subsidy levels and other changes to LRP and the significant improvement in the market feeder and live cattle prices (Figure 2). During 2019 and 2021, the USDA introduced several modifications to the LRP program. These changes not only reduced the producers’ portion of premium payments but also allowed them to defer premium payments until the end of the endorsement period. The option to pay premiums at the ending date offers ranchers a considerable cash-flow advantage. Another benefit of the LRP program is it doesn’t require a minimum number of cattle to be insured, meaning cow-calf or stocker producers with just a few head can use it.

    Additionally, the rise in cattle prices has emphasized the importance of implementing a solid price risk management plan. LRP can help minimize financial losses, secure profit margins, and reduce the risk of business failure, particularly in the face of higher investment levels. The increased adoption of LRP reflects a growing number of ranchers who are utilizing risk management plans in their operations.

    Figure 2: LRP Head per Year and Feeder and Live Prices per Month

    Source: USDA – RMA. Livestock Risk Protection Participation. https://www.rma.usda.gov/Information-Tools/Summary-of-Business/Livestock-and-Dairy-Participation


    Abello, Pancho. “Producers Embrace USDA’s Livestock Risk Protection Program.Southern Ag Today 3(44.2). October 31, 2023. Permalink

  • More Heifers Continue to Head to Feedlots

    More Heifers Continue to Head to Feedlots

    The latest Cattle on Feed Report raised some eyebrows, showing a slight (0.6 percent) increase in feedlot inventory from last year. Placements of cattle on feed were up about 6 percent driven by higher 700-900 pound placements. In the current setting of tighter supplies and smaller calf crops, many might be rightfully surprised to see an increase in cattle inventory numbers. However, there is plenty to unpack in this report that has both short-term and long-term implications for cattle markets. 

    My first big takeaway is the strong number of heifers on feed. The quarterly breakdown of steers vs. heifers on feed was released with this report and showed that 40 percent of feedlot inventories were heifers. This is the highest percentage in over 20 years and indicates that producers continue to send many heifers to feed instead of retaining for reproduction. There are two sides to this: (1) heifers are helping to boost inventories now which could be viewed somewhat negatively for prices in the short term but also (2) fewer heifers retained means a smaller calf crop next year which can be viewed as supporting high price levels in the longer term. To me, this report shut down any ideas that herd expansion is happening or will happen in 2023, that discussion will shift toward whether expansion occurs in 2024. 

    The increase in placements is interesting because it likely reflects producers selling now to take advantage of strong markets but also some producers being forced to sell feeder cattle a little earlier than expected due to expanding drought in many areas. Looking ahead at price expectations, it is worth noting that the current strong market prices have not really reflected herd rebuilding efforts yet. The rebuilding phase will include holding back more heifers which will mean fewer heifers sold as feeder cattle. Combined with smaller calf crops as a whole, this will be the point when feeder cattle supplies get really tight and prices have the strongest supply-side support. 

  • Balance of Trade Has Shifted as Beef Production has Decreased

    Balance of Trade Has Shifted as Beef Production has Decreased

    While the vast majority of beef produced in the U.S. is consumed domestically, international markets are a significant piece of the U.S. beef system. For perspective, the U.S. exported the equivalent of about 12.5% of its beef production during 2022, while importing roughly 12%. This was a fairly typical balance of trade, especially for a year with high beef production levels like last year. However, as beef production is on track to see a significant drop in 2023, trade patterns are also being impacted.

    Through August, exports of U.S. beef are down by 14% from the first eight months of 2022. A drop of that magnitude certainly warrants some question but is largely a case of year-over-year comparison being a little misleading. For the first two quarters of 2023, beef production was about 4% lower than 2022. With lower production levels, a larger share of U.S. production will be consumed domestically. Additionally, high price levels are also making imports of U.S. beef less attractive in many countries. For example, exports to our three largest destinations (South Korea, Japan, and China) are all down sharply so far this year.

    The same factors that have led to lower export levels have also led to an increase in U.S. beef imports. Through the first eight months of the year, U.S. beef imports are up by a little over 5%. The largest percentage increases are in beef imports from Australia, New Zealand, and Uruguay, which are primarily sources of lean trim to go into ground beef. Unlike 2022 when the U.S. was a slight net exporter of beef, we are very much on track to be a significant net importer in 2023. Through August, U.S. beef imports have exceeded exports by more than 20%.

    This trend towards increased imports and decreased exports is likely to continue for the next few years. Given that this calf crop is smaller than last year’s calf crop, beef production is likely to decrease in 2024. And given expectations for lower beef cow inventory next year, I would expect beef production to be lower again in 2025. The same supply fundamentals supporting strong cattle prices are resulting in a significant shift in the balance of trade for beef. And as beef supplies get increasingly tighter over the next couple of years, we are likely to see an ever greater divergence between imports and exports.

    Burdine, Kenny. “Balance of Trade Has Shifted as Beef Production has Decreased.” Southern Ag Today 3(42.2). October 17, 2023. Permalink

  • Cow Culling Climbing Seasonally

    Cow Culling Climbing Seasonally

    Cow culling, as indicated by the weekly cow slaughter data, is starting to increase going into the last quarter of the year but cow slaughter normally peaks in the Fall because that’s when more beef cow culling decisions are made.  For the week ending September 23rd, the last data available, 127,600 cows went to federally inspected plants, the largest week since the last week of June.  For the year, cow slaughter has totaled 4.8 million head, 5.6 percent less than last year. 

    The total cow slaughter data masks the different seasonal patterns for beef cows and dairy cows.  Beef cow slaughter typically peaks in the Fall and is at its lowest around February-March.  Beef cow slaughter is down 13.4 percent compared to a year ago.  The data is reported by region with Region 6 including Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Arkansas.  The rest of the South (except Virginia) are reported in Region 4.  Beef cow slaughter in Regions 4 and 6 are 4.9 and 19.3 percent lower than last year, respectively.  Cow culling in the deep South has not fallen as much as the average across the country, while slaughter in the western part of the South has fallen faster than the average.  That may suggest some ability or willingness to try to expand herds in different parts of the region.

    Dairy cow slaughter typically peaks in the January-March period.  Low milk prices and margins have triggered more culling this year with dairy cow slaughter 4.6 percent higher than last year.  Higher prices and improving margins over the last 3 weeks have finally pulled down dairy slaughter below a year ago.

    Cull cow prices appear to have topped out seasonally and are starting to decline.  Southern Plains auction prices declined to $72 per cwt last week, their lowest since June.  While tight beef supplies are keeping prices high, the cull market loses the impact of grilling season demand once we are past Labor Day.  

    What to Watch For?

    Even though beef cow culling normally increases this time of the year, watch for weekly slaughter relative to last year and the 5-year average.  The opportunity to begin herd expansion may begin with a smaller Fall run of cows this year, maybe even with a couple of weeks below the 5-year average.  We most likely saw the biggest weekly beef cow slaughter of the year back in January.  On the dairy side, watch for slaughter to remain below the 5-year average in the coming weeks.  Have enough dairy cows been culled to support a path to profitable production?  Can some cows be profitably held over the winter to take advantage of seasonal price increases next year with the added bonus of improved weight and quality along with, maybe, a calf to sell too?

    Anderson, David. “Cow Culling Climbing Seasonally.Southern Ag Today 3(41.2). October 10, 2023. Permalink