Category: Livestock Marketing

  • Surprisingly Big Placements in the June Cattle on Feed Report

    Surprisingly Big Placements in the June Cattle on Feed Report

    The latest Cattle on Feed report was released on Friday by USDA-NASS. June 1 total cattle on feed for feedlots with capacity of 1,000 or more head was estimated at 11.55 million head which was 2.9 percent below June 1, 2022. This marked the ninth consecutive month that total cattle on feed was lower than the same month of the previous year. 

    The biggest surprise from this report was the larger than expected placements of cattle into feedlots during May which were estimated at 1.96 million head. Placements were 4.6 percent (86,000 head) above May 2022 totals which was above the pre-report average expectation of a 1.7 percent increase. This was the largest May placements total since 2020. 

    Placements were higher across all weight classes except for the 900-999 pound group which was down 2.3 percent. Placements of cattle weighing less than 600 pounds were up 4.1 percent, 600-699 pounds up 9.3 percent, 700-799 pounds up 3.2 percent, 800-899 pounds up 6.5 percent, and over 1,000 pounds up 6.7 percent. 

    Looking at regional placements, most of the overall increase was driven by Nebraska where placements were 13.9 percent higher than last May, and placements were up double digits in all weight categories. Drought almost certainly was a factor in the larger Nebraska placements. Placements in Texas were interesting because of the contrast between light and heavy weight placements. Texas placements of under 600 pound cattle were up 7.1 percent (10,000 head) while placements over 800 pounds were down 8.7 percent (10,000 head) as compared to May 2022.

    Cattle marketings were reported at 1.95 million head which is 1.8 percent above a year ago. This was slightly higher than expected pre-report but within the range of expectations. 

    Looking ahead, it will be interesting to watch where cattle on feed numbers go during the summer months. Cattle on feed numbers typically decline in the summer and reach their seasonal low point around August before beginning to expand again for the Fall. Just how low that low-point is this year, and the percentage of heifers, will be informative for discussions on cattle and beef supplies. 


    Maples, Josh. “Surprisingly Big Placements in the June Cattle on Feed Report.Southern Ag Today 3(26.2). June 27, 2023. Permalink

  • Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Fed Cattle

    Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Fed Cattle

    In our recent  Southern Ag Today article, Uptick in Livestock for Feeder Cattle, we showed that Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) purchased for feeder cattle has increased starting in 2021. LRP, an insurance policy that cattle producers can purchase daily to insure a minimum price level for a certain period, is also available for fed cattle (cattle greater than 1,000 pounds). One of the reasons why LRP was developed was to provide producers who do not sell 50,000 pounds of cattle at one time, which is a futures and option contract increment, an opportunity to hedge cattle. Fed cattle, however, are typically grouped and sold in larger loads, which better suits them to use futures and options to hedge cattle. The 2019 and 2020 increase in the premium subsidy rate for LRP did lower the cost of LRP to producers (Boyer and Griffith 2023a,2023b) and did appear to influence producers to purchase more fed cattle LRP contracts. In 2021 and 2022, the number of head and contracts sold has increased nearly four times (as opposed to the tripling in feeder cattle policies). Thus far in 2023, there has been a record number of LRP contracts sold and head insured. Similar to the feeder cattle contracts, the number of fed cattle insured with LRP is still relatively small compared to the number of eligible cattle. However, this policy tool seems to be growing in use and with increasing fed cattle prices, it will be interesting to see how many policies are purchased through the rest of the year.  

    References

    Boyer, C.N., and A.P. Griffith. 2023a. “Subsidy Rate Changes on Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48(1):31-45. (Link)

    Boyer, C.N., and A.P. Griffith. 2023b. “Increasing Livestock Risk Protection Subsidies Impact on Producer Premiums” Agricultural Finance Review 83(2):201-210. (Link)


    Boyer, Chris, Charley Martinez, Eunchun Park, Andrew P. Griffith, and Karen L. DeLong. “Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Fed Cattle.Southern Ag Today 3(25.2). June 20, 2023. Permalink

  • Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle

    Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle

    Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) is an insurance policy that cattle producers can purchase to insure a minimum price level when they market their cattle. LRP policies are available daily and can be customized by the number of head (between one and 25,000 head per crop year), the insurance periods (13, 17, 21, 26, 30, 34, 39, 43, 47 or 52 weeks), and coverage levels (70-100%) of an expected price at the end of the insurance period. Additionally, a policy can be adjusted for sex, breed, and weight. Policyholders are paid an indemnity payment at the end of an insurance period if the actual price is lower than the insured coverage price. LRP has been available to producers since 2003, but the purchase of LRP policies by feeder and fed cattle producers has been low. In 2019 and 2020, the premium subsidy rate for LRP was increased. The adjustment reduced the insurance premium cost to producers. The premium subsidy increased to 20% from 13% of the total premium cost in 2019. Then, in 2020, a tiered subsidy rate was set. Subsidy rates became 35% for coverage between 95–100%, 40% for coverage between 90–94.99%, 45% for coverage between 85–89.99%, 50% for coverage between 80–84.99%, and 55% for coverage between 70–79.99%. 

    We recently published research analyzing the impact of the premium subsidy rate increase on feeder and fed cattle LRP costs and, as expected, found these changes reduced the cost of LRP to producers (Boyer and Griffith 2023a, 2023b), but we were still not sure how producers responded to these lower premiums until recently. The figure below shows the number of policies sold and head of cattle insured by year in the US under LRP. Starting in 2021, there has been an increased interest in LRP feeder cattle policies, with purchases and the number of head insured nearly tripling. While the increase in LRP sales is higher than before, purchases of LRP relative to the cattle eligible for LRP coverage is still low. It should also be noted that other factors than the subsidy rate could be driving the increased use of LRP (i.e. risk experienced due to COVID-19, recent feeder calf price increases). 

    References

    Boyer, C.N., and A.P. Griffith. 2023a. “Subsidy Rate Changes on Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48(1):31-45. (Link)

    Boyer, C.N., and A.P. Griffith. 2023b. “Increasing Livestock Risk Protection Subsidies Impact on Producer Premiums” Agricultural Finance Review 83(2):201-210. (Link)


    Boyer, Chris, Charley Martinez, Enchun Park, Andrew Griffith, and Karen L. DeLong. “Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle.” Southern Ag Today 3(24.2). June 13, 2023. Permalink

  • Our Most Read Articles for 2022-2023

    Our Most Read Articles for 2022-2023

    Every July at the Southern Extension Committee Meetings, Southern Ag Today likes to take the opportunity to recognize our authors for all their hard work. We look at all the articles written over the past year May 2022 – April 2023 and decide which were read, viewed, and shared the most using our analytics. We are pleased to announce our 2022-2023 winners.

    Overall Winner – Yanshu Li, “Do I need to pay the Net Investment Income Tax on my timber income?

    Crop Marketing Monday Winner Hunter Biram & Will Maples, “Key Takeaways and Reliability of the 2023 Prospective Planting Report

    Livestock Marketing Tuesday David Anderson, “Another Week, Another Record

    Farm Management Wednesday Max Runge, “ Wheat Straw Nutrient Removal

    Policy/Trade Thursday Bart Fischer and Joe Outlaw, “An Early Look at the Farm Safety Net for Cotton in 2023

    AgLaw/Specialty Topics Friday (Cooperatives) – John Park,   “Should We Form a Cooperative?

  • $185

    $185

    Fed cattle futures prices surged to $185 for April 2024 and $175 in the nearby (June) contract, at the time of this writing.  This rocket ship ride to record prices is fueled by some fundamental market conditions and some conditions outside of the cattle and beef market.

    Cash fed cattle prices have increased and some of the increase in futures prices is the futures playing catch up.  Feeder cattle prices are along for the ride.  Feeder cattle, 7-800 pound steers, in the South approached $200 per cwt while those in the Southern Plains hit $213 in local auctions.  

    On the fundamental side, cattle and beef supplies are certainly tighter.  Daily average fed steer and heifer slaughter in May is 2.9 percent smaller than last year.  Beef production over the last 4 weeks is 3.9 percent smaller than last year.  Beef production reflects fewer beef cows going to market and lighter fed cattle dressed weights.  

    On the demand side of the fundamental ledger, beef demand appears to continue to support higher prices. While packer margins are certainly much smaller, packers continue to demand cattle (us economists call this “derived demand”).  Consumers continue to buy beef and there is little evidence of large scale switching to less expensive meats.  

    Other, broader market considerations are also working to boost prices.  The recent budget deal to avoid U.S. default provided a boost to the stock market that spilled over into other commodity markets.  Continued strong employment numbers are supported income and demand.  These factors contribute to some reduced fears of recession and better beef demand expectations.  

    On balance, tighter supplies and good demand have boosted prices.  Other economic conditions have added some fuel for even higher prices.  Some good questions remain.  Are calf prices high enough to kick off significant herd expansion?  Competing meats are becoming cheaper relative to beef –   will we see some evidence of consumer purchasing changes?  For all the questions out there, no doubt higher prices are good news for ranchers after multiple years of tight or negative margins.


    Maples, Josh, and David Anderson.“$185.” Southern Ag Today 3(23.2). June 6, 2023. Permalink