Author: Charley Martinez

  • Current Non-Real Estate Farm Debt

    Current Non-Real Estate Farm Debt

    As mentioned in previous Southern Ag Today (SAT) articles (Martinez and Ferguson 2022), monitoring Non-Real Estate Farm Debt provides insight into debt health. Last year had periods of drought and increased input prices for producers. At the time of this article, planting is complete, producers are bailing hay, input prices have come down, and cattle prices are the highest since 2015. But, through the first quarter of 2023, there are mixed signals from the most recent call reports. As a refresher, every commercial bank in the U.S. submits quarterly Reports of Condition and Income which are known as call reports. Within these call reports are totals of agricultural loans and the status (on time or late) of the loans. Figure 1 displays the total loan volume (yellow line) and total loan volume for all three late type volumes (30-89 days late, 90+ days late, non-Accrual) for the last nine quarters. The totals are for all the Southern Ag Today States. 

                Through the first quarter of 2023, non-accrual (blue line) loans continued to decrease, which is positive, and loans that are 90+ days late (grey line) remained relatively the same. Total loans (yellow line) are down from the previous quarter, which is expected due to seasonality trends. But total loan debt is up 4.8% compared to a year ago, which could be due to the effects of input price increases in 2022. The most concerning statistic is the loans that are 30-89 days late (orange line). Debt that is 30-89 days late is up 5.2% from a year ago, and the highest since Q1 of 2021.  Q1 is seasonally the highest quarter for 30-89 days late loans, but given that it’s up from a year ago, this loan type will provide an indication of debt health moving forward in the next round of call reports that come in a few months. 

                From a sky high view, the call reports indicate that there are some possible caution signals for debt in the SAT states. However, total non-current debt is approximately 1%, which is still relatively low. The next two quarters will provide answers if the signals are false alarms or true signals of concern. In the coming months, it is crucial that producers are mindful of their working capital and continue the positive production and risk management strategies they have implemented thus far. 

    Figure 1. Non-Real Estate Farm Debt from 2021 Q1- 2023 Q1

    Source: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

    References

    Martinez, Charley, and Haylee Ferguson. “Current Non-Real Estate Farm Debt“. Southern Ag Today 2(30.3). July 20, 2022. Permalink


    Martinez, Charley. “Current Non-Real Estate Farm Debt.” Southern Ag Today 3(23.3). June 7, 2023. Permalink

  • Beef Price Spread Relationship with Processing Capacity Utilization

    Beef Price Spread Relationship with Processing Capacity Utilization

    When US cattle slaughter facilities temporarily shut down during COVID-19, the live cattle to wholesale boxed beef price spread, which is the difference between the value of live cattle price and wholesale boxed beef value, reached record highs. The processing disruptions caused the fed cattle price to decline and beef price to increase. The price spread had a similar, but less extreme, reaction when beef processing capacity was temporarily shut down after the Tyson beef-packing plant fire in August 2019. These events led to questions regarding the interaction of the number of cattle slaughtered nationally each week and the price spread. Now that cattle numbers are declining and packing capacity is increasing questions about capacity utilization and the price spread remain.  

    In a recent article, my co-authors and I investigate the dynamic relationship between industry-level weekly (Monday through Friday) and Saturday operational slaughter capacity utilization with the live cattle to box beef price spread. Below are the highlights of the journal publication and our estimates of weekly and Saturday slaughter capacity utilization. 

    Key results from our study:

    • We find bidirectional causality between weekly slaughter capacity utilization, Saturday slaughter capacity utilization, and the live cattle to box beef price spread over the entire study period (2010-2021). In plain English, this means that the number of cattle processed on Saturdays affects the price spread and vice versa.  However, additional analysis indicates these causal relationships don’t always occur.
    • An increase in the price spread in the previous week positively impacts the number of cattle processed nationally on Saturday in most weeks.  That result makes a lot of intuitive economic sense because the larger spread implies more profits which is the market signal to produce more beef.  This might suggest Saturday slaughter is more than a “catch up” day of processing but could also be a strategy to increase slaughter when the price spread is increasing.
    • This study does not find statistical evidence to support the notion that weekly, or Saturday slaughter capacity utilization is used by the beef packers to control the price spread.

    Figure 1. Weekly (Monday through Friday) and Saturday Operational Cattle Slaughter Capacity Utilization from 2010 to 2021 in the United States

    Paper Citation

    Martinez, C., Li, P., Boyer, C. N., Yu, T. E., & Maples, J. G. (2023). Beef price spread relationship with processing capacity utilization. Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jaa2.48


    Martinez, Charles, Pengzhen Li, Christopher N. Boyer, T. Edward Yu, and Joshua G. Maples. “Beef Price Spread Relationship with Processing Capacity Utilization.Southern Ag Today 3(10.2). March 7, 2023. Permalink

  • Managing for Foundation Traits in Beef Cows

    Managing for Foundation Traits in Beef Cows

    The beginning of the year marks the start of female and bull buying decisions for producers in the southern states. Whether a producer is selecting for Continental, British, American, or a combo of the three, this publication serves as a reminder of the foundation traits to manage for this buying season. Foundation Traits refer to Stayability, Fertility, Structural Soundness, Udder Quality, Disposition, Adaptability and Maintenance, and Index Selection. Selecting cattle based on these traits can increase the likelihood of the operation being profitable in the short and long term. Below is a description of three of these traits. 

    Stayability: a cow’s ability to remain in the herd past its “break-even” point is determined by multiple traits. The all-encompassing phenotype that is recorded by many breed associations is called Stayability (STAY). Stayability measures the likelihood that a bull’s daughters will remain in the herd long enough (typically 6 years old) to recoup their development and maintenance costs if they breed on time.

    Fertility: In concert with Stayability, maintaining fertile females and keeping daughters out of bulls that are fertile is critical to the herd’s profitability. Failing to rebreed is the most common reason cows are culled from herds. That said, a surprising number of cows
    get a second chance when open. The extra feed and variable costs required to maintain that cow will hinder the profitability of the operation if it stays in the herd. When a cow misses a calf, it does not become profitable until year 7 or 8, depending upon calf prices. If a cow misses twice, it does not become profitable until year 11. Thus, while it is possible for cows that miss a calf to be profitable, it takes more years to realize that profit, which makes fertility a critical financial driver. 

    Structural Soundness: Cattle must have good feet and leg structure to graze, travel, and breed, and the discomfort of poor feet and leg structure reduces the time they spend grazing or drinking. Besides directly impacting performance, it creates animal welfare issues. Hoof trimming and other management interventions may prolong an unsound cow’s productive life, but these are likely to incur costs and significant additional labor. Figure 1 displays scores for foot, claw, and side leg. 

    Figure 1. Phenotype scoring scales for foot angle (top), claw set (middle), and side leg profile (bottom). A score of 5 is the most desirable for all three scores.

    Image courtesy American Simmental Association

    The impacts of foundation traits on cowherds reach far beyond making a producer’s life easier. Many of these traits have direct costs that impact the bottom line, while others add labor. This additional labor often is confused with convenience, but its actual financial cost is often undervalued or completely ignored. A producer’s time is worth something! Depending upon a producer’s breeding and calving seasons, the cost of spending additional time or incurring additional variable costs affects the operation’s profitability and efficiency. A more in-depth description of the foundation traits can be found here.


    Martinez, Charley, Troy Rowan, and Justin Rhinehart. “Managing for Foundation Traits in Beef Cows.” Southern Ag Today 3(2.3). January 11, 2023. Permalink

  • Current Non-Real Estate Farm Debt

    Current Non-Real Estate Farm Debt

    Through 2022, the ag sector in the Southern Ag Today (SAT) states has sustained periods of drought, volatile prices in respective markets, and interest rate hikes. As mentioned in a previous article (Martinez and Ferguson 2022), it is crucial to know where agriculture debt is in our SAT states during these unusual times. This article covers the latest commercial bank reports from the U.S. commercial quarterly performance reports. As a refresher, these reports highlight agricultural loans and the loans’ status (on time or late). Figure 1 displays the total loan volume (yellow line) and total loan volume for all three late type volumes (30-89 days late, 90+ days late, Non-Accrual) for the last seven quarters. The totals are for all the Southern Ag Today States. 

    Through the third quarter of 2022, non-accrual loans and 90+ days late have continued downward trends. Non-accrual loan volume continued to decrease and is down 65% from a year ago. While 90+ days late loans stayed relatively steady. A real positive sign is seen in the total debt volume for loans that are 30-89 days late. The total volume of debt in this category is down $4 billion compared to a year ago. These are positive signals that bad loan debt load hasn’t increased during this turbulent year. All three late and bad loan types continue to show signs of good debt health for the SAT states, and this is reinforced by the total loan volume being approximately unchanged from a year ago.   

    As producers navigate through this environment, the current status of commercial ag debt appears healthy and even improving. In the coming months, it is essential that producers are mindful of their working capital, and they should continue the positive strategies that they have implemented thus far. 

    References

    Martinez, Charley, and Haylee Ferguson. “Current Non-Real Estate Farm Debt.” Southern Ag Today 2(30.3). July 20, 2022. Permalink


    Martinez, Charley, and Haylee Ferguson. “Current Non-Real Estate Farm Debt.” Southern Ag Today 2(49.3). November 30, 2022. Permalink

  • Growth in Forward Delivery Beef Sales

    Growth in Forward Delivery Beef Sales

    In 2022, beef production has been higher than last year. An indication of beef demand can be seen in wholesale beef prices. Anderson (2022) highlighted how the wholesale price of primals translate to the retail consumer. In addition to the boxed beef cutout value report, beef sales in the wholesale market can provide insights into current and future market demand for increased beef production this year. 

                Beef sales are reported by four types or methods: negotiated cash sale with the beef being delivered in 0-21 days, negotiated cash sale with the beef delivery in 22+ days, formula, and forward contract. For definition, a negotiated sale can have a delivery window of either 21 or less days or 22+ days. This means that the contracted beef will be delivered from the packer to the buyer in either 21 or less days or in 22 or more days. Prior to the mid-2000s, most beef was sold using negotiated cash sales. After the mid-2000s, formula based sales became the predominant way beef was sold in the wholesale market. Although volume of negotiated sales has decreased since 2002, the decrease depends on the type of delivery window of the sale. The trends and data discussed below use sales data from the weekly comprehensive cutout report.  Figure 1 displays the total number of weekly load sales for the four transaction methods:  negotiated cash sale with the beef being delivered in 0-21 days, negotiated cash sale with the beef delivery in 22+ days, formula, and forward contract. 

                As indicated in figure 1, negotiated sales with delivery in 21 days or less (blue line) has trended downward since 2010, while negotiated sales with delivery in 22+ days (yellow line), and formula sales (orange line) has trended upwards in volume during the same time frame. Forward contract volumes have remained relatively unchanged. Thus, the net loss seen in negotiated beef sales is attributable to the decrease in negotiated sales with delivery in 21 or less days. 

    Compared to this week a year ago, volume of negotiated sales with delivery of 0-21 and 22+ days are down by 18% and 7%, respectively. But, through September of this year, volume of negotiated sales with delivery of 0-21 and 22+ days are down by 2%, and up 6%, respectively. The increase use of negotiated cash sales with deferred delivery could be an indicator of risk management by wholesale market participants with an expectation of future price movement.

    Figure 1. Weekly Beef Sales by Transaction Method, Number of Loads

    Source: Livestock Marketing Information Center

    Reference:

    Anderson, David. “Wholesale Beef Prices“. Southern Ag Today 2(38.2). September 13, 2022. Permalink


    Martinez, Charley. “Growth in Forward Delivery Beef Sales“. Southern Ag Today 2(43.2). October 18, 2022. Permalink

    Beef Photo by Jason Leung on Unsplash