Blog

  • Wheat Acres in the South

    Wheat Acres in the South

    The Southern region of the United States is more associated with cotton production than wheat. Yet, from 2005 to 2022, a time of high grain prices associated with increased production of biofuels, wheat planted acres in the South, on average, have exceeded that of cotton (Figure 1).  Wheat acres and production in the region are dominated by Oklahoma and Texas (Figure 2); Texas also leads cotton planted acres, by far, followed by Georgia (Figure 3). In 2022, the South will account for about 20 percent of total U.S. wheat production (USDA, NASS, Crop Production, August 2022). 

    The year with the most wheat acres in the South in this ‘biofuel era’ is 2013 at 17.3 million. That year saw the highest plantings in seven of the fourteen states in the region for this period of time: Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. Oklahoma and Texas are not on this list. Acreage increases across multiple states can add up to make a significant difference in total wheat area in the region.  

    Wheat is a crop with relatively high yield potential across the South. This becomes especially important when drought impacts major producing states.  With drought lowering harvested acres and yields, Oklahoma and Texas are projected to produce about 109 million bushels of wheat in 2022 from 4 million harvested acres and 9.8 million acres planted (Figure 4).  The states of Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, Maryland, and Virginia combined to plant about 2 million acres of wheat for 2022 and will match the production total in Oklahoma and Texas. Kentucky’s production alone is 90 percent of that of Texas.  

    Years with high wheat acres in the South tend to be associated with years of relatively low cotton acres (Figure 5).  Crop acres are positively correlated with the price received in the previous season (Figures 6 and 7). Wheat acres are negatively correlated to higher cotton prices (Figure 8).  Additionally, wheat acres tend to go up following years of high abandonment of cotton in Texas and Oklahoma (abandonment rates in other Southeastern states are minimal) (Figure 9).  In 2022, Texas and Oklahoma farmers planted 8.6 million acres of cotton, only to harvest 2.8 million (a harvested-to-planted percentage of 33 percent). 

    Looking ahead to 2023, what are wheat acreage prospects in the South given:

    • record high wheat prices[*]
    • record high cotton prices*, and
    • high cotton abandonment in Texas and Oklahoma? 

    A regression model composed of these independent variables and recent trends in wheat planted acres shows that wheat planted area:

    • is trending lower,
    • goes up when the price of wheat the previous year goes up,
    • goes down when the price of cotton the previous year goes up,
    • goes up when percent of cotton harvested in Texas and Oklahoma the previous year goes down.   

    Based on these variables, the model estimate of wheat acres in the South for 2023 is 14.4 million, up from 12.7 million acres planted in 2022 (Figure 10). Many factors will shape farmers’ planting decisions in 2023, among them persistently high input costs, lingering drought, returns from other crops such as corn and soybeans, and price prospects given global economic and geopolitical turmoil and uncertainty. This model suggests that significant factors are in place for an increase in wheat acres in 2023, maintaining wheat as an important crop enterprise in the South. 

    Figure 1. Southern region planted wheat and cotton acres, 2005-2022

    Source: USDA, NASS

    Figure 2. High, low, and average winter wheat acres in the South, 2005-2022

    Source: USDA, NASS

    Figure 3. High low, and average cotton acres in the South, 2005-2022

    Source: USDA, NASS

    Figure 4. Southern region wheat production 2022, million bushels

    Source: USDA, NASS

    Figure 5. Wheat acres and cotton acres in the South, 2005-2022

    Figure 6. Wheat acres in the South and the previous year’s wheat price, 2006-2022

    Figure 7. Cotton acres in the South and the previous year’s cotton price, 2006-2022

    Figure 8. Wheat acres in the South and the previous year’s cotton price, 2006-2022

    Figure 9. Wheat acres in the South and percent cotton acres harvested the previous year in Texas and Oklahoma, 2006-2022

    Figure 10. Southern region wheat acreage model


    [*] U.S. Season Average Farm Price, World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates, September 2022

    Welch, J. Mark. “Wheat Acres in the South“. Southern Ag Today 2(43.1). October 17, 2022. Permalink

  • Changes May Come to Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers with the Inflation Reduction Act

    Changes May Come to Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers with the Inflation Reduction Act

    On August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA). The IRA will provide USDA assistance and support for underserved farmers, ranchers, and foresters by amending section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. This will provide $125,000,000 for USDA assistance and support for underserved farmers, ranchers, and foresters through technical assistance, $250,000,000 in land loss assistance, $10,000,000 in funding for equity commissions addressing racial equity issues with USDA, $250,000,000 in funding for research education and extension, $2,200,000,000 for discrimination financial assistance, and $3,100,000,000 to provide payments for the cost of loans or loan modifications with respect to distressed borrowers of direct or guaranteed loans administered by FSA. Additionally, the IRA addresses environmental concerns in agriculture and conservation by including $20,000,000,000 for climate-smart agriculture practices, $5,000,000,000 for fire resilient forests and forest conservation, and $2,600,000,000 for coastal habitat conservation and restoration.[1]

    The Inflation Reduction Act repealed section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan, allowing funding originally intended for debt relief (but stuck in litigation) to be reallocated. The ability to receive an individual payment due to discrimination may be better for farmers who would not have benefited from debt relief provided in section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan. 

    Research conducted by the Federation of Southern Cooperatives for the Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers Policy Research Center (The Policy Center) has found that one of the identified challenges that Heirs’ property participants face was a lack of information or assistance making productive use of their land. In 2014, a research study conducted by Prairie View A&M University, on behalf of The Policy Center, found that SDFRs needed to be further educated on USDA programs to increase their applications. Heirs property continues to be an issue, and Policy Center research conducted by Auburn University conservatively estimated that there are 579k heirs’ properties with a combined total acreage of 6.8m valued at $47.3b across the 14 states they studied. 

    Institutions that serve, work with, and educate historically marginalized communities play a vital role in all of these areas that will be impacted by the IRA. These institutions provide the necessary technical support and outreach needed for most farmers to run a successful operation. These institutions also aid in creating the next generation of those who will work with these farmers, and the IRA ensures that there is funding to do that. 

    The Inflation Reduction Act is crucial to the survival of Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers, and it is clear that change will come with its implementation. The only question is how much change will it truly bring? 


    [1] For additional information, see previous Southern Ag Today articles on the history of debt relief, the IRA, and heirs property.

  • Does the May 2022 CBO Baseline Provide Any Information About the Ability to Increase Commodity Reference Prices?

    Does the May 2022 CBO Baseline Provide Any Information About the Ability to Increase Commodity Reference Prices?

    One of the most asked questions we get is whether the next farm bill will contain a reference price increase for covered commodities to offset higher input prices.   Both the price loss coverage (PLC) and agriculture risk coverage (ARC) safety net programs use reference prices in their respective calculations.  Focusing on PLC, with relatively high market prices, it would seem that now is the time to increase reference prices as market prices for many covered commodities are above their respective reference prices.  This would mean reference prices could be raised modestly without triggering much, if any, payment.  This analysis sets aside the question of whether the agricultural committees will have any more money to write the next farm bill.

    Table 1 provides the ratio of marketing year average prices to reference prices for seven covered commodities from 2023 to 2032.  The results in Table 1 that are green indicate the market price is above the reference price for the commodity for that year.  And conversely, ratios that are red indicate market prices that are below reference prices.  One of the first things that jumps out in the table is that the 2023 marketing year has all but peanut prices higher than their respective reference prices.  CBO projects prices to decline below reference prices for all but corn and soybeans over their projection period.  Generally, this wouldn’t bode well for the agricultural committees being able to increase reference prices; however, the last column in the table contains base acres for each of the covered commodities.  Two of the biggest crops in terms of base acres (corn and soybeans) that account for more than 146 million base acres are projected to experience prices above their respective reference prices.  The remaining commodities with relatively lower marketing year average prices account for less than 100 million acres, with wheat accounting for more than one-half of the total.

    Time will tell whether reference prices can be increased, which will largely depend on an infusion of new money into the farm bill process.  Proponents should feel cautiously optimistic that a reference price increase could be feasible.

    Table 1.  Ratio of Marketing Year Average Prices to Reference Prices and Base Acres.


    Outlaw, Joe, and Bart Fischer. “Does the May 2022 CBO Baseline Provide Any Information About the Ability to Increase Commodity Reference Prices?Southern Ag Today 2(42.4). October 13, 2022. Permalink

  • Short-Term Contingency Plans for Southern Producers

    Short-Term Contingency Plans for Southern Producers

    A farm manager wears many hats and deals with a lot of different businesses and tasks in running a farm. Business planning and succession is its own topic (and an important one), but sometimes there are short-term scenarios when farm managers or key personnel are away from the farm because of personal matters, sickness, vacation, or even unexpectedly passing away. These are stressful events, even more so when business and farm obligations start to pile up. Having a comprehensive plan in one place provides a critical resource to anyone needing to step in and temporarily continue these tasks. 

    We have listed several resources below that are available for use. Consider them prompts and outlines to think through what is needed. Your family, local Extension agent, and other trusted confidants are good resources to help you develop your plan. Once it is complete, make copies and clearly communicate where those are located. A good short-term contingency plan should detail accounts, contacts, obligations, and critical information a farm manager deals with. Some examples of the information detailed would be: (1) tracts of land with corresponding surveys or maps of the property (2) livestock feed/availability, veterinarians, and grazing plans for cattle (3) the location of keys, business documents, and contact information for advisors or partners to the farm.

    Several points to consider:

    Information related to the farm can frequently change and in a short period of time the information could be out of date. Plans should be reviewed after significant changes on the farm, or at a minimum, reviewed annually.  Tax filing time, when you are already reviewing business information, may be a good opportunity to schedule a contingency plan review. Having bad or outdated information could be as detrimental as having no information at all.

    Some information can be highly sensitive such as bank accounts, passwords, and other confidential data.  This information can be critical to communicate because a family member trying to figure out passwords, or resetting accounts could be a long, frustrating process. There are safe & secure options to digitally store sensitive information or physical lists may be kept in a secure location.

    Having multiple copies of the plan is advised and distributing those to any relevant personnel.  In addition, one central copy could help ensure availability. Depending on your relationship with each, consider informing your banker, lawyer, neighbor, etc. of your operation’s contingency plans. 

    Short-term planning is part of a larger discussion of operational risk and transition planning. Having a strategy to transfer relationships and responsibilities according to an owner’s wishes should not be ignored. Succession planning resources are often available through your local Extension office. We encourage you to reach out to a trusted advisor. Adequate short and long-term planning can help farms sustain their operation into the future.

    Credit: University of Missouri Extension – Short-Term Operating Plan https://extension.missouri.edu/media/wysiwyg/Extensiondata/Pub/pdf/manuals/m00202.pdf

    Resources:

    1. Short-Term Operating Plan for farms and ranches https://extension.missouri.edu/media/wysiwyg/Extensiondata/Pub/pdf/manuals/m00202.pdf. Primarily hand-written worksheet used to document important aspects of the business
    2. AgPlan https://agplan.umn.edu Business planning website run through the Center for Farm Financial Management. It is free to use AgPlan, and once logged in you would select ‘Short-Term Operating Plan.’ 
    3. Code Red “Contingency Planning for Your Family and Farm Operation” https://ag.purdue.edu/department/agecon/fambiz/_docs/leadership-succession-planning/code-red.pdf Microsoft Excel workbook can be printed, shared virtually, or distributed through thumb-drives.

    Burkett, Kevin, and Scott Mickey. “Short-Term Contingency Plans for Southern Producers“. Southern Ag Today 2(42.3). October 12, 2022. Permalink

  • Negotiated Fed Cattle Sales Decline in 2022

    Negotiated Fed Cattle Sales Decline in 2022

    Since the 2019 fire at the Tyson plant in Holcomb, Kansas a lot of attention has been given to the volume of fed cattle traded through different transaction types, largely due to concerns over price discovery. 

    Fed cattle sales are categorized into two types; negotiated and non-negotiated sales. Negotiated transactions are sales made in the cash or spot market, and include negotiated cash sales and negotiated grid sales. Non-negotiated transactions are sales in which at least the base price is not negotiated in the time immediately preceding the transaction. Non-negotiated transaction types include formula sales, forward contract sales, and grid sales. 

    A major difference between the two is that negotiated sales contribute to price discovery, while non-negotiated sales do not. Price discovery is the result of an interaction (bid and ask) between buyers and sellers. The base price for a non-negotiated sale is often based on negotiated prices in the time period immediately preceding the sale, but the sales themselves do not contribute to price discovery. 

    Negotiated trade volumes as a share of total trades have declined in 2022 when compared to both 2021 and the previous five year average, regardless of region. Though negotiated trade as a share of total trade remains high in regions like Iowa-Minnesota and low in regions like Texas-Oklahoma-New Mexico, the share of total transactions that are negotiated has dropped across the board. Interestingly, this trend is not coupled with lower fed cattle prices, as slaughter cattle prices have remained higher than 2021 and the previous five year average through 2022, and have been relatively stable.  

    Benavidez, Justin. “Negotiated Fed Cattle Sales Decline in 2022“. Southern Ag Today 2(42.2). October 11, 2022. Permalink