Blog

  • When is the “Best” Time to Buy Farm Diesel?

    When is the “Best” Time to Buy Farm Diesel?

    Years ago, at a county production meeting with growers, I was asked by a producer: “When is the best time of year to buy farm diesel?” In other words, he wanted to know if there is any seasonality to farm diesel fuel prices. 

    Seasonality of prices occurs when there is a time (season) of the year when prices are high or low compared to the annual average price. We typically see seasonality of prices in crops, fruits and vegetables, and some cuts of meat (steaks). An example of seasonality here in Georgia, the price of watermelons tends to be lower during the summer months when local melons are harvested and sold throughout the region. However, during winter months (or Georgia’s off-season for watermelons), prices are higher because there are fewer for sale, and grocers have to source them from other parts of the country or world.

    Most often, seasonal indices use monthly data over a 5-year (60-month) period. In the last 5-years, we have had a global pandemic and the war between Russia and Ukraine, which have both affected global petroleum prices and local diesel prices in different ways. Because these events created much volatility in fuel prices, I wondered if they also impacted the seasonal behavior of diesel fuel prices.


    Seasonal Indices of Farm Diesel Fuel Prices in the US Lower Atlantic Region for the 60 months prior to the Covid-19 Pandemic and the most recent 60 months.

    Chart Source: Author Created with data from the US Energy Information Administration and the Georgia Department of Revenue information on Excise Taxes

    The figure shows two monthly seasonal price indices for farm diesel. The first index (orange) was created from data during the five years, or 60 months, prior to the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, from January 2015 through December 2019. The orange index can be considered a baseline since it was created from data prior to the pandemic and the war in Ukraine. The second index (blue) is based on recent data from the past 60 months, from June 2018 through May 2023. The solid black line at 100 represents the average annual price over each 60-month time period. When the monthly average index falls below 100, we can assume that prices during that month tend to be below the annual average price (i.e., a better time of the year to buy diesel). When the monthly index rises above 100, we can assume prices during that month tend to be above the annual average price (i.e., not the ideal time of the year to buy diesel).

    So how have things changed since the pandemic and the war in Ukraine? Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the best times of the year to buy diesel appeared to be August and December.  Things have changed slightly in the most recent 60 months with the most pronounced differences occurring in January and March, likely influenced by the invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022 and the steep run-up of diesel fuel prices that followed. Based on the last 60 months of data, the seasonal index suggests a stronger pattern of two buying windows: winter (Dec-Feb) and late summer (Aug-Sep).

    Individual producers should keep in mind that these indices are based on historical data and local prices may differ from regional price averages. Future events that cause market volatility may occur and cause prices to behave differently, or a lack of major events might return us to the less volatile pre-pandemic seasonal price trends. Furthermore, any potential savings from bulk seasonal purchases must be weighed against the cost of fuel storage. For producers who already have on-farm storage capabilities for diesel fuel, it may be worth considering purchases of farm diesel during the winter and late summer so they can capitalize on lower prices.

    Resources: 

    Georgia Department of Revenue State Excise Tax on Motor Fuels https://dor.georgia.gov/taxes/business-taxes/motor-fuel-tax/calculating-tax-motor-fuel

    US Energy Information Administration, Petroleum and Liquid Fuels Data, Lower Atlantic Diesel Retail Prices: https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emd_epd2d_pte_r1z_dpg&f=m


    Smith, Amanda R. “When is the “Best” Time to Buy Farm Diesel?” Southern Ag Today 3(24.3). June 14, 2023. Permalink

  • Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle

    Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle

    Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) is an insurance policy that cattle producers can purchase to insure a minimum price level when they market their cattle. LRP policies are available daily and can be customized by the number of head (between one and 25,000 head per crop year), the insurance periods (13, 17, 21, 26, 30, 34, 39, 43, 47 or 52 weeks), and coverage levels (70-100%) of an expected price at the end of the insurance period. Additionally, a policy can be adjusted for sex, breed, and weight. Policyholders are paid an indemnity payment at the end of an insurance period if the actual price is lower than the insured coverage price. LRP has been available to producers since 2003, but the purchase of LRP policies by feeder and fed cattle producers has been low. In 2019 and 2020, the premium subsidy rate for LRP was increased. The adjustment reduced the insurance premium cost to producers. The premium subsidy increased to 20% from 13% of the total premium cost in 2019. Then, in 2020, a tiered subsidy rate was set. Subsidy rates became 35% for coverage between 95–100%, 40% for coverage between 90–94.99%, 45% for coverage between 85–89.99%, 50% for coverage between 80–84.99%, and 55% for coverage between 70–79.99%. 

    We recently published research analyzing the impact of the premium subsidy rate increase on feeder and fed cattle LRP costs and, as expected, found these changes reduced the cost of LRP to producers (Boyer and Griffith 2023a, 2023b), but we were still not sure how producers responded to these lower premiums until recently. The figure below shows the number of policies sold and head of cattle insured by year in the US under LRP. Starting in 2021, there has been an increased interest in LRP feeder cattle policies, with purchases and the number of head insured nearly tripling. While the increase in LRP sales is higher than before, purchases of LRP relative to the cattle eligible for LRP coverage is still low. It should also be noted that other factors than the subsidy rate could be driving the increased use of LRP (i.e. risk experienced due to COVID-19, recent feeder calf price increases). 

    References

    Boyer, C.N., and A.P. Griffith. 2023a. “Subsidy Rate Changes on Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48(1):31-45. (Link)

    Boyer, C.N., and A.P. Griffith. 2023b. “Increasing Livestock Risk Protection Subsidies Impact on Producer Premiums” Agricultural Finance Review 83(2):201-210. (Link)


    Boyer, Chris, Charley Martinez, Enchun Park, Andrew Griffith, and Karen L. DeLong. “Uptick in Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle.” Southern Ag Today 3(24.2). June 13, 2023. Permalink

  • Our Most Read Articles for 2022-2023

    Our Most Read Articles for 2022-2023

    Every July at the Southern Extension Committee Meetings, Southern Ag Today likes to take the opportunity to recognize our authors for all their hard work. We look at all the articles written over the past year May 2022 – April 2023 and decide which were read, viewed, and shared the most using our analytics. We are pleased to announce our 2022-2023 winners.

    Overall Winner – Yanshu Li, “Do I need to pay the Net Investment Income Tax on my timber income?

    Crop Marketing Monday Winner Hunter Biram & Will Maples, “Key Takeaways and Reliability of the 2023 Prospective Planting Report

    Livestock Marketing Tuesday David Anderson, “Another Week, Another Record

    Farm Management Wednesday Max Runge, “ Wheat Straw Nutrient Removal

    Policy/Trade Thursday Bart Fischer and Joe Outlaw, “An Early Look at the Farm Safety Net for Cotton in 2023

    AgLaw/Specialty Topics Friday (Cooperatives) – John Park,   “Should We Form a Cooperative?

  • Difficulty in Forecasting 2023 U.S. Cotton Production

    Difficulty in Forecasting 2023 U.S. Cotton Production

    It is frequently challenging to forecast crop production because of varying local weather and crop conditions.  In the case of upland cotton, the situation is further complicated by plant biology. The major row crop substitutes to U.S. cotton include corn, sorghum, wheat, soybeans, and peanuts. The first three of these are annual grasses, while the latter are annual legumes. The reproductive strategy of these annuals is to produce as much seed (yield) as allowed by weather and soil conditions. As a result, aggregate yields of annual crops are often thought to be well correlated with weekly crop condition rates. 

    In contrast, upland cotton is relatively more complicated in its growth habits and resulting predictability.  The reason is that cotton is a perennial in its native tropical environment, akin to a crepe myrtle bush.  When grown as an annual crop in temperate regions, cotton plants can still shift back and forth between vegetative and reproductive growth.  This mixed and indeterminate growth habit is illustrated by a poor visual inspection of the weekly cotton crop condition and the resulting Texas average cotton yield (Figure 1).  The Texas aggregate situation is even further complicated by the range of planting dates, from March-April in southern Texas to May-June in northwestern Texas.  Such phenomena in Texas can have a major influence on U.S. production estimates since Texas represents over half of U.S. planted acreage (USDA NASS). 

    The situation in 2023 is further complicated by a mid-year shift in the weather.  The first quarter of 2023 saw severe drought conditions over much of Texas (Figure 2, left panel).  Widespread and repeated rains since April have reportedly helped developing crops in southern Texas while complicating planting in northwestern Texas.  How much the latter will contribute to more or less cotton production is unknown. It is possible that the State will realize prevented planting from drought preceding prevented planting from too much rain.  With much of the growing season still ahead, further shifts in weather may also occur.  It may not be until early fall before we have reliable forecasts of the resulting production outcome.

    Figure 1. Texas Cotton Crop Condition Index

    Source USDA/NASS

    Figure 2. U.S. Drought Monitor Maps from March 7, 2023, and June 6, 2023


    Robinson, John. “Difficulty in Forecasting 2023 U.S. Cotton Production.Southern Ag Today 3(24.1). June 12, 2023. Permalink

  • Feasibility Analysis—A Key Step to Success 

    Feasibility Analysis—A Key Step to Success 

    Streams of grant funding such as broadband support, the infrastructure bill, FEMA disaster prevention, and business attraction often come in large waves and encourage rural communities to improve local capacity and infrastructure. When generating ideas, planning, and creating strategies and action plans to apply for a grant, it is key to conduct a feasibility analysis. Take the time to evaluate if the local community has the resources, time, and inputs needed to take on the project as well as the resources and capacity to sustain the effort. 

    The overarching goal of a feasibility analysis is to understand “is this a viable idea to proceed with” (1). Feasibility studies often include market analysis, technical analysis, financial analysis, as well as environmental and social impacts (1,2,3,4). Results should help the community understand if the effort balances the financial, social, and environmental costs with the benefits (3). The analysis should focus on both the feasibility of implementing or building the effort as well as maintaining it. Many communities skip the assessment of maintenance, and when programs fail or fizzle, infrastructure degrades or incurs deferred maintenance costs. 

    While some feel feasibility analysis can discourage a community from dreaming big, leaders should “know what they have to work with” (4) and focus on developing aspects in the community that can succeed. If projects or programs are not feasible, the community can prioritize a different effort or focus on building the capacity and partnerships needed to address feasibility concerns. 

    1. https://extension.psu.edu/feasibility-studies-what-are-they
    2. https://dec.vermont.gov/sites/dec/files/wsm/rivers/docs/shw_sullivanslides.pdf
    3. https://www.nrecainternational.coop/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Module5MethodologyforEvaluatingFeasibilityofRuralElectrificationProjects.pdf
    4. https://www.islandinstitute.org/ii-solution/feasibility-study/

    Walker, Jamie Rae. “Feasibility Analysis—A Key Step to Success.Southern Ag Today 3(23.5). June 9, 2023. Permalink