Blog

  • Look Out Overhead

    Look Out Overhead

    An important financial consideration for any business is the costs they incur during the year. Ultimately, it affects the amount of profit or loss that will be realized by the business. There are certain “costs of doing business” known as overhead. These are things that an organization will have to pay for but are not designated to any one activity. An example might be property taxes. The taxes are owed and necessary for the business to maintain its property and obligations but typically could not be solely attributable to one activity like raising livestock or producing a crop. Usually, the costs are known but sometimes take a backseat to direct input costs when it comes to evaluation. For a true look at profitability, overhead must be factored in. The good thing is it may present opportunities for the business to cut down on its overall spending. 

    Overhead expenses occur once a year, several times a year, or even more sporadically. The first step is making sure they are logged in the books and records of the business. They can be reviewed to make sure they are necessary, reasonable, and have ultimately been paid. Common overhead expenses include insurance, taxes, depreciation, utilities, office expenses, and salaries. This list may not be all-encompassing, and it is important to mention that any personal expenditures for these items are not included in farm profitability.  Often, the business will have a bill or receipt that includes the amount. For others, it may be more of a calculation like depreciation or extracting the business use of utilities. The main goal is to account for all “costs of doing business”. 

    Determining total overhead is the first step. Once that has been completed, a producer may want to allocate the overhead costs to their different enterprises. This is not necessarily a precise calculation but is up to the owner or business manager. Some may approach it from a revenue perspective. For instance, if cotton is 50% of total farm revenue, then 50% of overhead will be allocated to it. Another method may be according to labor hours. If the time spent on a particular crop is 50% of the total hours worked (by everyone on the farm), then 50% of the overhead will be allocated to that crop. Product mix and profit margins will be different on each farm, so it is up to them to determine what is most appropriate. 

    In reviewing the information, a farm may realize that there are opportunities to cut costs. While not advocating for a farm to run without its necessary expenditures, overhead may be where some costs can be scrutinized. Checking insurance rates every couple of years can provide the same coverage at a lower cost from a different carrier. Computer software and other subscription services may have promotions or discounts for being a continued customer. Perhaps there are subscription services that are going unused and could be cut out completely. If computer equipment is upgraded every couple of years, extending that out an additional year or two can defer the expense. Often, farmers may attend trade shows or conferences to pick up new information. Sometimes, the conference host or other farm organizations will provide a cost share for travel or reimbursement for the conference. 

    The above are only a few ideas of cutting overhead costs. Individually, the costs may not account for much, but an effort to manage overhead can provide significant combined savings in the long run. If a farm is operating fairly lean from an input perspective, overhead may provide other opportunities to affect profitability. At the end of the day, revenues minus expenses determines net returns. Which expenses are reduced does not matter for the overall equation.


    Burkett, Kevin. “Look Out Overhead.” Southern Ag Today 3(52.3). December 27, 2023. Permalink

  • EQIP Overview for Livestock Producers

    EQIP Overview for Livestock Producers

    Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) has been a very popular program with livestock producers for many years.  EQIP is a working lands conservation program administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to provide conservation programs for farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners. It’s meant to help producers improve water and air quality, build healthier soils, and improve wildlife habitats by providing both financial and technical assistance. The good news for livestock producers is that fifty percent of the EQIP funding is mandated for livestock related practices. 

    Some practices that cattle producers may find beneficial are fencing, cross fencing, forage harvest management, heavy use area protection (gates, feeding areas), herbaceous weed control, pasture and hay planting, nutrient management, livestock shelter protection, prescribed grazing, watering facilities.

    Other practices that are livestock related are in the following list. (This is not a complete list.)

    Access control

    Animal mortality management

    Brush management 

    Composting facility 

    Conservation Crop Rotation

    Constructed Wetland

    Contour Farming 

    Dam

    Energy Efficient Agricultural Operation, Insulation, lighting

    Firebreak

    Groundwater testing

    Irrigation 

    Land Clearing

    Livestock Pipeline

    Obstruction Removal

    Organic Management

    Pond

    Short term storage of Animal waste and By-products

    Silvopasture

    Sinkhole Treatment

    Stream crossing

    Watering Well

    Woody Residue treatment 

    Many of the eligible practices might also overlap with production systems related to carbon payment opportunities.  If you are thinking about carbon options, it might be worth exploring the potential for EQIP participation.  Several past SAT articles have discussed carbon programs and contracts here.   

    There are many practices that NRCS can provide financial and/or technical assistance that is beneficial for environment and sustainability. Look at the EQIP page for more information.

    https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-initiatives/eqip-environmental-quality-incentives

    Here are some important points to keep in mind in learning more about EQIP.  

    To get started, you need to register with the Farm Service Agency to participate in the USDA programs. 

    https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/Outreach/pdfs/Brochures/4%20Steps%20to%20Assistance.pdf

    Even though the deadline for signing up for is typically the end of October or early November, producers are encouraged to sign up any time during the year.

    Available practices and practice standards can vary by state and by year so check with you local NRCS office to see what is available in your area. State contacts can be found at:

    https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/conservation-basics/conservation-by-state

    Finally, get to know you’re the local USDA staff at your USDA service center or offices. They can provide valuable information on how best to get assistance for the programs that are offered.


    Runge, Max. “EQIP Overview for Livestock Producers.Southern Ag Today 3(52.2). December 26, 2023. Permalink

  • The New Small Business Reporting Rule and Your Farm

    The New Small Business Reporting Rule and Your Farm

    In September of 2022, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, more commonly known as “FinCEN,” issued the Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Rule[i] (“Reporting Rule”) under the bipartisan Corporate Transparency Act[ii], requiring disclosure of the identity of beneficial owners of small business entities. This new rule is intended to prevent the operation of shell companies by criminal actors such as terrorism financiers, drug traffickers, human traffickers, money launderers, and the like. The Treasury Department estimates that criminal actors generate $300 billion in illicit proceeds through shell companies every year. 

    It is important to note that agricultural business entities are not exempt from this Reporting Rule which requires disclosure beginning on January 1, 2024. If your farm, ranch, or agricultural operation is set up as a legal business entity (such as an LLC, LLP, business trust, corporation, etc.) created through your state corporation commission, secretary of state, or other similar office, your operation is likely subject to the new Reporting Rule. There are 23 specific entity types exempt from the Reporting Rule, largely composed of publicly traded entities, financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, and large operating companies, but there are no specific exemptions for agricultural entities. 

    There are several online tools available to help you determine if your operation is a reporting entity as defined by the rule. If you determine that your operation is subject to the Reporting Rule, you must identify and report the beneficial owners of your farming and ranching business. A beneficial owner is any individual who exercises substantial control over the entity or who owns or controls 25% or more ownership interest in the entity. Those exercising substantial control include those who are senior officers, those with authority to appoint or terminate senior officers, important decision-makers, and those who otherwise uniquely exercise substantial control over the entity through contracts, relationships, or other agreements or arrangements. The rule provides limited exceptions for minor children, agents, employees, inheritors and creditors. Entities must report the beneficial owners’ name(s), date(s) of birth, address(es), and government-issued identification(s) such as a U.S. passport or driver’s license.

    Entities required to report created on or after January 1, 2024 have 30 days from the entity’s creation to complete the online reporting requirements. Entities created prior to January 1, 2024 will have until January 1, 2025 to complete their reporting. Once an entity is required to report, any changes in beneficial ownership must also be reported within 30 days of any such change. For instance, if a new member or partner joins the entity and/or otherwise becomes a beneficial owner as defined by the rule, that must also be reported within 30 days of the effective change.

    How does this practically affect farmers and ranchers? The Reporting Rule does not affect an entity’s operations, rather, its purpose is to identify those with a vested interest in the entity. The most important thing to remember is to timely comply with the filing requirements and then continue with your normal operations. The rule aims to hinder financial criminals from benefiting from their ill-gotten gains and was not implemented as a means to exercise control or oversight over your legally-run business entity.

    To learn more about whether your agricultural operation is subject to the Reporting Rule and who and how you must report, visit www.fincen.gov/boi-faqs and FinCEN’s Small Entity Compliance Guide.[iii]


    [i] 31 CFR 1010.380

    [ii] 31 USC 5336 §6403

    [iii] (Tidgren, AALA Annual Agricultural Law Educational Symposium, 2023)


    Friedel, Jennifer. “The New Small Business Reporting Rule and Your Farm.Southern Ag Today 3(51.5). December 22, 2023. Permalink

  • Bracing for Change: Stacking Risk Management Tools for 2024

    Bracing for Change: Stacking Risk Management Tools for 2024

    The weather outlook for the Southern Great Plains and Southeast regions in 2024 and beyond signals a heightened risk of intense downburst events and extended periods without rainfall[1]. This shift poses a big challenge for rainfed farms, especially with the transition from La Nina to El Nino ENSO patterns, which could mean too much rain in certain southern areas.

    The timing of these weather events is crucial for farming success. Farmers recognize this and use various strategies like crop insurance, safety net programs like Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC), and disaster programs. Combining these tools strategically, following program guidelines, helps strengthen individual farms’ resilience against unpredictable weather.

    Recent events, especially those resulting in financial support, strongly influence farmers’ decisions—this is known as ‘recency effects.’ A study in the Southern Great Plains[2] found that when a weather disaster triggered a government program payment in the previous year, farmers were more likely to buy crop insurance the next year. This effect was even stronger for farmers already using crop insurance who had received both indemnity and a government program payment. Interestingly, as D2 drought weeks increased, policy sales also rose by a factor of 1.017, underlining the impact of recent experiences on risk management choices.

    Farmers also stack safety net programs based on expected weather challenges. A recently published analysis[3] showed that combining a safety net program with crop insurance led to better financial outcomes under a wide range of potential yields compared to relying on any one program alone. For rainfed wheat farmers, the best strategy involved combining PLC and revenue protection multi-peril crop insurance, along with planting a double crop of summer soybeans or grain sorghum alongside winter wheat. This not only maximized net returns but also reduced return variability.

    PLC wasn’t triggered for the 2022 crop year, and commodities triggering a PLC payment rate were limited in 2020 and 2021 due to high commodity prices. ARC payments depended on county-level yields, reflecting weather-related damages to crops. As a result, many farmers have widely chosen ARC County (ARC-CO) coverage for 2023. Combining ARC-CO election with crop insurance has proven to yield higher net returns than relying solely on crop insurance, although payment limits can result in lower payments than PLC when the price program triggers.

    With deadlines for 2023 disaster programs approaching in January, followed by ARC/PLC election and crop insurance deadlines later in the spring, the importance of whole-farm risk management is clear. Navigating these challenges requires farmers to carefully combine available tools, adapt to evolving climate projections, and strengthen their operations against future uncertainties.

    Days with Excess Precipitation (Greater than 3 inches) in the Southeast over time. (Figure 19.3 from the IPCC 2018) 

    Source: Carter, L., A. Terando, K. Dow, K. Hiers, K.E. Kunkel, A. Lascurain, D. Marcy, M. Osland, and P. Schramm, 2018: Southeast. In Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II [Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stewart (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 743–808. doi: 10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH19

    [1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 5th Assessment. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/north-america/

    [2] Unpublished study by Hagerman, A.D., L.H. Lambert, and M. Fan “Recency effects of drought and government disaster payments on crop insurance decisions in the Southern Great Plains.” Presented at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Austin, TX: August, 2021.

    [3] Westbrook, L., D.M. Lambert, A.D. Hagerman, L.H. Lambert, E.A. DeVuyst, and C.A. Maples. 2023. “Should Producers of Rainfed Wheat Enroll in Agricultural Risk Coverage or Price Loss Coverage?” Choices Magazine. Vol 38(Q4). Available online at: https://www.choicesmagazine.org/choices-magazine/submitted-articles/should-producers-of-rainfed-wheat-enroll-in-agricultural-risk-coverage-or-price-loss-coverage

  • Exploring Diverse Crop Insurance Options for Cotton Producers

    Exploring Diverse Crop Insurance Options for Cotton Producers

    The risk in crop production, encompassing yield fluctuations and market price volatility, presents uncertain conditions for agricultural producers. To address and alleviate these uncertainties, the use of crop insurance is a key risk management strategy. The different crop insurance policies available for cotton producers frequently results in uncertainty concerning the variety of policies accessible and the specific regions where these policies are applicable.

    For upland cotton, a range of Federal crop insurance plans serves to mitigate the inherent risks associated with cotton production. The Federal Crop Insurance Program (FCIP) for upland cotton encompasses three insurance plans offering farm-level protection against deep losses, which include complete losses. Yield Protection (YP) offers protection against only farm-specific yield losses, while Revenue Protection (RP) is designed to counter revenue losses triggered by variations in futures prices and farm yield. Revenue Protection with Harvest Price Exclusion (RP-HPE) also guards against revenue decline based on futures prices and farm yield but without the benefit of an adjusted revenue guarantee when harvest prices are above projected prices. 

    In addition to farm-level deep loss insurance, shallow loss programs such as the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO), Enhanced Coverage Option (ECO), and Stacked Income Protection (STAX) complement the risk management landscape. These policies are called shallow loss programs because none of these policies offer protection for complete losses. SCO and ECO function as add-on insurance products, which require enrollment in an underlying individual or farm-level plan of crop insurance (YP, RP, or RP-HPE) for enrollment. Both of these policies provide area or county-level protection. SCO and ECO follow the coverage of the underlying policy. If a producer chooses Yield Protection, then SCO and ECO cover yield loss. If a producer chooses Revenue Protection, then SCO covers revenue loss. SCO is only available for farms not enrolling in the Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program. Stacked Income Protection (STAX) functions as an add-on or a standalone product, which can be enrolled with or without the individual or farm-level plan of crop insurance (YP, RP, or RP-HPE). STAX is exclusively accessible to cotton producers whose base acres are not enrolled in the ARC or Price Loss Coverage (PLC) programs. Importantly, STAX may not be purchased with ECO or SCO. 

    Biram and Connor (2023) provide a comprehensive discussion regarding how to utilize crop insurance programs with an overlap between the deep loss and shallow loss insurance programs. Aside from the deep and shallow loss programs previously mentioned, cotton producers have access to two more crop insurance options: Area Risk Protection Insurance (ARPI, including Area Revenue Protection and Area Yield Protection) and Hurricane Insurance Protection – Wind Index (HIP-WI). ARPI offers coverage based on the overall performance of a designated area, usually a county. ARPI safeguards against revenue or yield loss within a county. Meanwhile, HIP-WI assists by covering a part of the deductible of the primary crop insurance policy when a county or a neighboring one faces sustained hurricane-force winds. HIP-WI’s coverage can be combined with SCO and STAX when the insured acreage is also covered by a companion policy (YP, RP, or RP-HPE). A summary of these insurance programs available for cotton is summarized in Table 1. 

    Ask your crop insurance agent if these plans of insurance are available in the county in which you produce cotton (see Agent Locator Tool offered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency). While insurance policies serve as vital tools in mitigating risks associated with cotton production, their intricacies underline the importance of understanding all the options and developing a comprehensive plan for managing price and yield risks.

    Table 1. Individual and area crop insurance products with associated indemnity triggers and status as a standalone product for upland cotton (updated 2/8/2024)

    ProductTypeTriggerStandalone
    Deep Loss Programs
    Yield Protection (YP)IndividualFarm YieldYes
    Revenue Protection (RP)IndividualFarm RevenueYes
    Revenue Protection, Harvest Price Exclusion (RP-HPE)IndividualFarm RevenueYes
    Shallow Loss Programs
    Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO)AreaCounty Yield or County RevenueNo
    Enhanced Coverage Option (ECO)AreaCounty Yield or County RevenueNo
    Stacked Income Protection (STAX)AreaCounty RevenueYes, and can be purchased as an add-on Policy
    Stacked Income Protection, Harvest Price Exclusion (STAX-HPE)AreaCounty RevenueYes, and can be purchased as an add-on Policy
    Additional Programs
    Area Risk Protection (ARP)AreaCounty Yield or County RevenueYes
    Hurricane Insurance Protection – Wind Index (HIP-WI)AreaHurricane or Tropical Storm Incidence and Wind Speed*No

    *Hurricane and Tropical Storm triggers: Hurricane is wind speed, and Tropical Storm is wind speed plus county average rainfall total.

    Reference:

    H. Biram and L. Connor. (2023). Types of Federal Crop Insurance: Individual and Area Products. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Fact Sheet, Publication No. FSA75.


    Chong, Fayu, Yangxuan Liu, and Hunter Biram. “Exploring Diverse Crop Insurance Options for Cotton Producers.Southern Ag Today 3(51.3). December 20, 2023. Permalink